Zollege is here for to help you!!
Need Counselling
IELTS logo

Some People Say That Non-Vegetarian Food Should Be Banned IELTS Writing Task 2

OverviewOverview Esexam dates esIELTS Exam DatesIELTS ResultsIELTS RESULT ESIELTS Writing Task 2IELTS ReadingIELTS Speaking TopicsIELTS PreparationIELTS ListeningIELTS Exam PatternIELTS Practice PapersIELTS Coaching in IndiaIELTS CutoffNews

Some People Say That Non-Vegetarian Food Should Be Banned IELTS Writing Task 2 is an agree-disagree essay and consists of three sample answers. The task requires the candidates to provide a tentative and argumentative answer to the question. The IELTS sample answers - Some People Say That Non-Vegetarian Food Should Be Banned IELTS Writing Task 2 comprises two parts: Introduction and body. The introduction is a brief description of the topic. The body contains argumentative statements and tentative answers to support the test-taker's perspective. IELTS writing task 2 evaluates candidates based on the knowledge and views they have expressed. Some People Say That Non-Vegetarian Food Should Be Banned IELTS Writing Task 2 is measured by the areas like grammar, content, and structure. IELTS writing score is marked based on band scores. The band scores range from 0 to 9. Since the topics are very diverse, candidates must go through IELTS Writing practice papers to become familiar with a lot of topics.

Check: Get 10 Free Sample Papers
Check: Register for IELTS Coaching - Join for Free Trial Class Now

Topic : Some people say that non-vegetarian food should be banned. Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Band 7.5 Essay

Orthodox vegetarians have consistently raised arguments to put a ban on non-vegetarian food. This is because they consider it to be an inhumane act that encourages mass animal killing and puts lives of animals in danger for the convenience and self-indulgence of meat eaters. It is a hotly debated subject in many nations, which has increased the need to consider whether or not it ought to be outlawed. It will be a fair decision, to let diners choose what to eat rather than imposing it on them.

Initially, it is assumed that because of their upbringing in a particular ethical and social environment, humans are wise and possess the capacity to discern what is right and wrong for themselves. No one has the right or the power to impose their own will on another person because everyone has the freedom to make decisions independently. For instance, if the government put a ban or restriction on the availability of non-vegetarian food, it would be seen as a violation of their right to freedom of choice and cause stress, repression, and agitation among the population. When their rights are taken away, they will feel that the government doesn't value them as much, and their judgment and decision-making will come under scrutiny. Therefore, if they are given the freedom to make a better decision, it will be a thoughtful gesture. In addition, many people must consume animal-based food because of their dietary requirements and the geographic location of where they live. Animal hunting is the only way for people to survive and get the nutrients they need to maintain a daily healthy lifestyle in some geologically restricted areas. To give an example, hunting is the only way to survive in places like snow deserts where it is impossible to grow vegetation all year long. People will either leave these areas or die of hunger if non-vegetarian food is prohibited there. In such environments, it becomes crucial to rely on animal hunting to maintain life.

In summary, it's critical to avoid outright banning non-vegetarian food because people are capable of making wise decisions based on the situation.

Band 6.5 Essay

The decision to become a vegetarian or not or to ban nonvegetarian foods has long been a controversial one. Many think it's a great way to prevent serious health problems. This essay will clarify the paradoxical advantages of not being a vegetarian.

The first and most important argument in favor of eating meat is that it is rich in nutrients like fiber, protein, and calcium, all of which are crucial for maintaining energy levels throughout the day. Additionally, some professionals, like athletes, strongly advise against following a vegetarian diet. The recent example of an Indian wrestler named Geeta Phogat, who had to start eating chicken in order to build up enough stamina for wrestling, provides a good explanation for this. As a result, it has been discovered that eating meat keeps one physically fit. Furthermore, eating meat strengthens one's immune system. For instance, meat eaters can survive in extremely cold or hot weather because of their high physical resilience and therefore they are less likely to contract common illnesses like the common cold and high fever. One study conducted at the Apollo hospital in India revealed that 65% of those who had been afflicted with such illnesses tended to follow a vegetarian diet. And hence, it should go without saying that eating non-vegetarian food can benefit your health.

To summarize, this essay has shown how a non-vegetarian diet has a significant potential to increase one's physical strength and ability to combat common illnesses. Given these health advantages, it is likely that more people will begin following a non-vegetarian diet in the near future and so it is not advisable to ban it.

Band 8 Essay

Every aspect of life has changed as a result of technological and globalization advancements, and eating habits are no exception. Due to their need for food, people have been known to hunt since the dawn of recorded history. However, since the dawn of civilization, there have been ferocious debates about whether or not non-vegetarian food should be prohibited. This essay provides perspective reasons on why meat should not be prohibited because it is an essential part of our diets.

To start, foods made from animal flesh are renowned for having nutritive components that are almost nonexistent in vegetables. It's true that red meat is the only food that contains such a large amount of unsaturated fats as Omega-3. In general, Omega-3 is just fat that is good for human health and does not dissolve in the body. Therefore, removing non-vegetarian foods from diets is not a good idea. Animals are also essential components of the food chain. Clearly, the wilds are an important part of the food cycle on Earth; as a result, they must be used to keep the cycle's proper balance. For example, if wild animals are eliminated from the cycle, there will be an abundance of animals that could harm the environment. Additionally, going vegetarian will require using almost one-third of the planet's vegetation annually.

In conclusion, it is essentially impossible to eliminate meat from the diet due to the availability of highly nutritious elements and its presence in the food cycle, and its consumption in diet must be promoted to preserve the earth's natural habitat.

Read More IELTS Writing Related Samples

*The article might have information for the previous academic years, please refer the official website of the exam.

Ask your question

Subscribe To Our News Letter

Get Latest Notification Of Colleges, Exams and News

© 2024 Zollege Internet Private Limited