Hypnotism Is It Real Or Just a Circus Trick? Reading Answers
- Coaching in Delhi
- Coaching in Chandigarh
- Coaching in Hyderabad
- Coaching in Mumbai
- Coaching in Bangalore
- Coaching in Chennai
- Coaching in Gurgaon
- Coaching in Kerala
- IELTS Writing Tips
- Academic Listening Tips
- Best Way for IELTS Prep
- Coaching in Pune
- Coaching in Ernakulam
- IELTS Coaching Amritsar
- IELTS Classes Ahmedabad
- IELTS Coaching in Kolkata
Hypnotism Is It Real Or Just a Circus Trick? Reading Answers has 14 questions that are to be answered in 40 minutes. IELTS topic- Hypnotism Is It Real Or Just a Circus Trick? Reading Answers deals with hypnotism. Hypnotism Is It Real Or Just a Circus Trick? IELTS reading question type has two kinds of questions. That is choosing the correct answer and identifying whether a statement can correspond to the passage. Candidates need to skim through the passage for the best answer. Hypnotism Is It Real Or Just a Circus Trick? Reading Answers can help candidates to prepare for their exams. They can also refer to IELTS Reading practice papers.
Check: Get 10 Free IELTS Sample Papers
Check: Register for IELTS Coaching - Join for Free Trial Class Now
Section 1
Read the passage to answer the following questions
Hypnotism Is It Real Or Just a Circus Trick? Reading Answers
Hypnotism it real or just a circus trick?
A A Hypnosis has been shown through a number of rigorously controlled studies to reduce pain, control blood pressure, and even make warts go away. But because very few studies have attempted to define the actual processes involved, most scientists are sceptical of its power and uses. That scepticism has driven David Spiegel, a professor of psychiatry at Stanford University School of Medicine, USA, and other researchers to take a hard look at what happens in the brain during hypnosis.
B Along researchers there are two schools of thought. One claims that hypnosis fundamentally alters subjects’ state of mind: they enter a trance, which produces changes in brain activity. The other believes that hypnosis is simply a matter of suggestibility and relaxation. Spiegel belongs to the first school and over the years has had a debate with two scientists on the other side, Irving Kirsch, a University of Connecticut psychologist, and Stephen Kosslyn, a Harvard professor.
C Kirsch often uses hypnosis in his practice and doesn’t deny that it can be effective. ‘With hypnosis you do put people in altered states,’ he says. ‘But you don’t need a trance to do it.’ To illustrate the point, Kirsch demonstrates how a subject holding a small object on a chain can make it swing in any direction by mere suggestion, the chain responding to minute movements in the tiny muscles of the fingers.‘You don’t have to enter a trance for your subconscious and your body to act upon a suggestion,’ Kirsch says. The reaction is the result of your focusing on moving the chain in a particular direction.’
D Spiegel disagrees. One of his best known studies found that when subjects were hypnotised and given suggestions their brain wave patterns changed, indicating that they had entered a trance. In one of his studies, people under hypnosis were told their forearms were numb, then given light electrical shocks to the wrists. They didn’t flinch or respond in any way, and their brain waves resembled those of people who experienced a much weaker shock. To Kirsch this still wasn’t enough to prove the power of trance, but Stephen Kosslyn was willing to be convinced. Many external factors could have been responsible for the shift in the subjects’ state of mind, but Kosslyn wondered,‘Is there really something going on in the brain?’
E To find out, Spiegel and Kosslyn decided to collaborate on a study focusing on a part of the brain that is well understood: the circuit which has been found to process the perception of colour. Spiegel and Kosslyn wanted to see if subjects could set off the circuit by visualising colour while under hypnosis. They selected eight people for the experiment conducted at Massachusetts General Hospital. The subjects were put in a scanner and shown a slide with coloured rectangles while their brain activity was mapped. Then they were shown a black and white slide and told to imagine its having colour. Both tasks were then repeated under hypnosis.
F The results were striking. When the subjects truly saw the coloured rectangles, the circuit lit up on both sides of the brain; when they only had to imagine the colour, the circuit lit up only in the right hemisphere. Under hypnosis, however, both sides of the brain became active, just as in regular sight; imagination seemed to take on the quality of a hallucination.
G After the experiment, Kosslyn was forced to admit, Tm absolutely convinced now that hypnosis can boost what mental imagery does.’ But Kirsch remained sceptical, saying, The experiments demonstrate that people are experiencing the effects of hypnotic suggestion but don’t prove that they are entering a trance.’ He also argued that’ subjects were told to see the card in colour when they were hypnotised but only to imagine it in colour when they weren’t.‘Being told to pretend you’re having an experience is different from the suggestion to have the experience.’
H Spiegel, however, is a clinician first and a scientist second. He believes the most important thing is that doctors recognise the power of hypnosis and start to use it. Working with Elvira Lang, a radiologist at a Harvard Medical Centre, he is testing the use of hypnosis in the operating room just as he and Kossiyn did in the scanner. Spiegel and Lang took 24 patients scheduled for surgery and divided them into three groups. One group received standard care, another standard care with a sympathetic care provider and the third received standard care, a sympathetic care provider and hypnosis. Every 15 minutes the patients were asked to rate their pain and anxiety levels. They were also hooked up to painkilling medication which they could administer to themselves.
I On average, Spiegel and Lang found the hypnotised subjects used less medication, experienced less pain and felt far less anxiety than the other two groups. Original results published in The Lancet have been further supported by ongoing studies conducted by Lang.
J Spiegel’s investigations into the nature of hypnosis and its effects on the brain continue. However, if hypnosis is ever to work its way into mainstream medicine and everyday use, physicians will need to know there is solid science behind what sounds like mysticism. Only then will their reluctance to using such things as mind over matter be overcome.‘I agree that the medical use of hypnotism should be based on data rather than belief,’ says Spiegel‘, but in the end it doesn’t really matter why it works, as long as it helps our patients.’
Section 2
Solution and Explanation
QUESTIONS
Questions 27-31 The reading passage has ten paragraphs A-J Which paragraph contains the following information? Write the correct letter A-J in boxes 27-31 on your answer sheet.
NB You may use any letter more than once.
- Experiment show similarity between hypnosis and vision.
Answer: F
Supporting Sentence: Under hypnosis, however, both sides of the brain became active, , just as in regular sight
Keywords: Under hypnosis, however, just as, regular sight
Keyword Location: Paragraph F, lines 3-4
Explanation: Paragraph F talks about an experiment where hypnosis and vision are having similar characteristics. Therefore F is the answer.
- An experiment from an opposing expert.
Answer: C
Explanation: The entire paragraph C talks about the experiment and the opinions of an opposing expert Kirsch. Therefore C is the answer.
- Opposing views appear due to lack of data.
Answer: A
Supporting Sentence: But because very few studies have attempted to define the actual processes involved, most scientists are sceptical of its power and uses.
Keywords: because very few studies, most scientists are sceptical
Keyword Location: Paragraph A, lines 3-4
Explanation: From the sentences from paragraph A, it can be understood that due to insufficient information, there are various contradictory views. Therefore A is the answer.
- Medical benefits makes scientific proof unimportant.
Answer: J
Supporting Sentence: but in the end it doesn’t really matter why it works, as long as it helps our patients
Keywords: it doesn’t really matter, why it works, helps our patients
Keyword Location: Last paragraph, last line
Explanation: Paragraph J states that as long as it has medicinal advantages and helps patients, the scientific proof is unnecessary. Therefore J is the answer.
- An experiment using people who are under medical treatment.
Answer: H
Supporting Sentence: doctors recognise the power of hypnosis and start to use it.
Keywords: doctors, power of hypnosis, use it
Keyword Location: Paragraph H, lines 2-3
Explanation: Paragraph H states that doctors can use hypnosis for treatment. An experiment with people was also carried out. Therefore H is the answer.
Questions 32-36 Choose the correct letter, A, B, C or D. Write the correct letter in boxes 32-36 on your answer sheet.
- Kirsch uses a small object on a chain to demonstrate that
- inducing a trance is a simple process.
- responding to a suggestion does not require a trance.
- muscles respond as a result of a trance.
- it is difficult to identify a trance.
Answer: B responding to a suggestion does not require a trance.
Supporting Sentence: .‘You don’t have to enter a trance for your subconscious and your body to act upon a suggestion,’
Keywords: You don’t have, enter a trance
Keyword Location: Paragraph C, lines 6-7
Explanation: Paragraph C states that Kirsch shows that responding to a suggestion does not require a trance using a small object on a chain. Therefore option-B is the answer.
- Spiegel disagrees with Kirsch because the subjects in Spiegel’s experiment
- believed what they were told.
- showed changes in brain activity.
- responded as expected to shocks.
- had similar reactions to control subjects.
Answer: B showed changes in brain activity.
Supporting Sentence: Spiegel disagrees. One of his best known studies found that when subjects were hypnotised and given suggestions their brain wave patterns changed,
Keywords: Spiegel disagrees, his best known studies, found, hypnotised, brain wave patterns changed,
Keyword Location: Paragraph D, first two lines
Explanation: Paragraph D states that Spiegel disagrees with Kirsch because the participants in his study displayed altered brain activity. Therefore option-B is the answer.
- Kosslyn’s response to Spiegel’s electric shock experiment was to
- challenge the results because of external factors.
- work with Kirsch to disprove Spiegel’s results.
- reverse his previous position on trance.
- accept that Spiegel’s ideas might be correct.
Answer: D accept that Spiegel’s ideas might be correct.
Supporting Sentence: After the experiment, Kosslyn was forced to admit,
Keywords: After the experiment, Kosslyn, admit
Keyword Location: Paragraph G, first line
Explanation: According to paragraph G, Kosslyn acknowledged that Spiegel's theories might be accurate in response to his electric shock experiment. Therefore option-D is the answer.
- Spiegel and Kosslyn’s experiment was designed to show that hypnosis
- affects the electrical responses of the brain.
- could make colour appear as black and white.
- has an effect on how shapes are perceived.
- can enhance the subject’s imagination.
Answer: A affects the electrical responses of the brain.
Supporting Sentence: The results were striking. When the subjects truly saw the coloured rectangles, the circuit lit up on both sides of the brain;
Keywords: circuit lit up, both sides of the brain
Keyword Location: Paragraph F, first two lines
Explanation: With paragraph F, it can be understood that Spiegel and Kosslyn's experiment demonstrated how hypnosis alters the brain's electrical activity. Therefore option A is the answer.
- Kirsch thought Spiegel and Kosslyn’s results
- were worthy of further investigation.
- had nothing to do with hypnotic suggestion.
- showed that the possibility of trance existed.
- were affected by the words used in the instructions.
Answer: D were affected by the words used in the instructions.
Explanation: From paragraph G, it can be understood that Kirsch believed that the words used in the instructions had an impact on Spiegel and Kosslyn's findings. Therefore option-D is the answer.
Questions 37-40 Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading Passage 3?
In boxes 37-40 on your answer sheet, write
TRUE if the statement agrees with the information
FALSE if the statement contradicts the information
NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this
- Spiegel is more interested in scientific research than medical practice.
Answer: FALSE
Supporting Sentence: but in the end it doesn’t really matter why it works, as long as it helps our patients
Keywords: it doesn’t really matter, why it works, helps our patients
Keyword Location: Last paragraph, last line
Explanation: Paragraph J states that Speigel believed that as long as it has medicinal advantages and helps patients, the scientific proof is unnecessary. Therefore the given statement is false as it contradicts this information.
- Patients in the third group in Spiegel and Lang’s experiment were easily hypnotised.
Answer: NOT GIVEN
Explanation: The given statement has information that was not mentioned in the passage.
- In Spiegel and Lang’s experiment, a smaller amount of painkiller was needed by the hypnotised patients than by the other two groups.
Answer: TRUE
Supporting Sentence: On average, Spiegel and Lang found the hypnotised subjects used less medication, experienced less pain and felt far less anxiety than the other two groups
Keywords: hypnotised subjects, used less medication, than the other two groups
Keyword Location: Paragraph I, first three lines
Explanation: Paragraph I states that Spiegel and Lang discovered something important. The hypnotised subjects required less medication, felt less pain, and had significantly less anxiety than the other two groups. The given statement can correspond to the information and therefore it is true.
- Spiegel feels that doctors should use hypnotism only when it is fully understood
Answer: NOT GIVEN
Explanation: The given statement has information that was not mentioned in the passage.
Read More IELTS Reading Related Samples
- Unexpected Benefits to Human Brain Reading Answers
- Activities for Children Reading Answers
- Leaf Cutting Ants and Fungus Reading Answers
- Mammoth Kills 2 Reading Answers
- Myths about Public Speaking Reading Answers
- Origin of Species & Continent Formation Reading Answers
- Reducing Electricity Consumption on the Isle of Eigg - IELTS Reading Sample with Explanation
- Sustainable Growth At Didcot Reading Answers
- The Coconut Palm- IELTS Reading Sample with Explanation
- The Creativity Myth Reading Answers
- The Impact of the Potato Reading Answers
- The Sweet Scent of Success - IELTS Reading Sample with Explanation
- Twist in The Tale IELTS Reading Answers
- A History of Fingerprinting Reading Answers
- Beyond the Blue Horizon - IELTS Reading Sample with Explanation
- Britain Needs Strong TV Industry Reading Answers
- Finding the Lost Freedom Reading Answers
- Genealogy Reading Answers
- A Workaholic Economy Reading Answers
- Ocean Acidification Reading Answers
*The article might have information for the previous academic years, please refer the official website of the exam.