The next paragraphs analyse my justification for agreeing with the aforementioned statement from my point of view. First and foremost, people should be conscious of their surroundings. The entire country and the world will be impacted by the media's coverage of various negative, gruesome crimes and other issues. There are two reasons for this. First, people, especially the younger generation, like to mimic these activities and perform them literally. As an illustration, if a child is not adequately educated about violence and the ramifications of crimes depicted in newspapers or on television. And under the influence of their classmates, the child tries to mimic what he or she has previously witnessed, this can lead to problems. Parents would be much happier if the news was released to educate kids about the offences. Second, media outlets such as newspapers and broadcasters have a detrimental impact on people. Leading some to believe that the best course of action in a dispute is to kill the other party instead of working through it amicably. Additionally, these crime-related television ads, movies, pamphlets, and newspapers fundamentally alter people's mindsets. And cause them to lose their optimism for the future. However, if the media emphasises the positive aspects of people's futures, we will live braver lives and there will be less instability in the world. Children's mental growth will improve as a result, and the environment will be a nice place to live. In conclusion, I am adamant that public dissemination of material that is harmful to humanity should be regulated and prohibited. In contrast, these news stories aim to raise people's knowledge of crimes rather than motivating them to commit them or spreading the word about them.

Humans have a propensity to worry about the conditions in their environment. And newspapers and television have emerged as the main sources of accurate and up-to-date information on crimes and general conditions in our nation. Therefore, limiting this kind of information will lead people to search for problems that have no basis in reality, such as hoaxes or fake information. For instance, Indonesians recently learned about the murder of Joshua, which was carried out by an Indonesian policeman named Ferdy Sambo. If Indonesians just used social media for their news, they might not be aware that this is actually a criminal case. As the first focus of the problem was a dispute between the police and sexual abuse. As a result, the television can attest to the accident's veracity. Additionally, there is some helpful advice for the general public regarding problematic topics like crime. This is so because news also serves some societal and educational purposes. Particularly for younger generations, knowledge concerning crimes can be interpreted as advice on what to avoid doing. However, for certain students, this can also be a source of academic information. For instance, until the culprits are imprisoned, law students can understand the procedures and most recent information on the crime. In conclusion, it is not necessary to restrict access to some serious material that is shown on television and in the newspaper. Because it may become a valuable source for members of society who are highly curious and may provide them with knowledge and insightful information.

First off, hearing about horrifying crimes like rape or murders can have a psychological impact on everyone. People become terrified when they see live broadcasts of these murders with some unsettling pictures or visuals. Furthermore, it would be disastrous for kids to read or see such news on television. As a result, a child's innocence may be lost at a young age and they may feel uneasy as a result of the news. In fact, some kids are so negatively impacted that they start engaging in criminal actions like bullying. Therefore, news broadcasts should be controlled for the sake of the mental health of a country. Criminal news is nevertheless crucial for our general awareness and timely updates. These types of media are the only ones that allow people to instantly learn what is occurring in the globe and around them. They are regarded as the reliable source for learning anything. For instance, only news outlets and newspapers allowed the world to learn about the terrible terrorist attack on the World Trade Center in New York. It subsequently allowed other countries to provide a helping hand to the United States. Therefore, limiting the telecast may result in less or no real-time information about the world. To sum up, I feel that the media has to redesign their reporting in a way that would not harm the nation's psychology. While yet alerting the audience about the indiscretions. This is true despite the benefit of staying current with local or global news.