First and foremost, some developing countries have intolerable people. The ability to obtain necessities like food, education, and health is significantly impacted by them. According to a report from last year published by an international health agency, 64% of individuals live in poverty or below. And because there isn't enough money for school, 34% of children are not receiving an education. If students receive six years of free schooling, it will greatly help them develop their social skills and give them self-assurance. It can provide them support they need to face life's challenges. On the other hand, my issue is that free education is only provided for six years, which is insufficient. The task of classifying every individual will fall to the government. And all of them must receive free education up until they complete their higher studies. Along with those who are below the poverty line and those who are unable to care for their children. In order to help students become healthier and better able to concentrate in class, they can also offer free lunch. As an illustration, one state government in India provided free food and schooling. Education has steadily increased in order to benefit those kids. This state has now surpassed all others as the state with the highest level of education. To sum up, an education that costs money fosters children's physical, intellectual, and emotional development. Additionally, in order to live their lives, they require more government support.

First and foremost, the fact that free education alone is insufficient to alleviate the financial situation is to blame. However, because so many people lack access to basic essentials like food, shelter, and clothing, free education is only second on their list of priorities. The development of infrastructure is one area where the government should, for example, put their attention. These include constructing hospitals, roads, and establishing industries where residents may work and feel fulfilled since jobs provide independence. Therefore, compared to the aforementioned plan, generating job openings would be a greater strategy to reduce poverty. Additionally, it is undeniable that education improves wisdom, and that a nation's economy will grow as literacy rates rise. To address the new issue, the government needs, however, to think creatively. They ought to provide their citizens with vocational training so that they can put what they have learned into actual practice to support themselves. To give an example, farmers should be upgraded with new, cutting-edge machinery and should be given the best seeds in order to produce more crops for less money. To sum up, there is no doubt that education plays a significant role in boosting the nation's economy. However, the employment rate in a country and the success of the steps a government has implemented to address pressing challenges are related to GDP. To combat poverty, it would therefore be more effective to modernise existing professions and increase employment opportunities.

I only agree in part with the assertion. Because nations cannot grow by providing free education. First and foremost, the nation benefits from not only education but also from providing the society with appropriate employment and health care. The benefit of education lies in the fact that a nation's ability to develop quickly is largely dependent on how well educated and skilled its population is. The government should offer more than just free education; it should also address other issues. They can donate money or spend money to provide children and young people with a high-quality education. It will enable them to learn valuable skills and knowledge that will boost the nation's economy. For instance, Singapore's status as a developed nation is attributable to the fact that its residents are given access to free, high-quality education. On the other hand, if the government can establish relationships with some of the developed nations, it could aid in reducing their level of poverty. For instance, the state might export and import the resources or metals in order to profit from their sale. But this may help our countries expand in all areas, including the health and transportation sectors. After that, the countries can invest this cash in quality education, which will aid them in reducing poverty. In conclusion, I believe that strong relationships between emerging and developed countries are beneficial for the former. By investing the money in important sectors like education, health, and transportation, they will be able to achieve good financial and economic progress.