Zollege is here for to help you!!
Need Counselling
GMAT logo

The Asian American History Association Receives Approximately 1,000 Proposals GMAT Critical Reasoning

Overview es 2Overview en 2RegistrationExam PatternPreparation TipsPractice PaperResultCut offmock testNews
Sayantani Barman's profile photo

Sayantani Barman

Experta en el extranjero | Updated On - Jan 30, 2023

Question: The Asian American History Association receives approximately 1,000 proposals each year from individuals who wish to present papers at its annual meeting. The association’s officers would like to ensure constant standards of quality in the presentations from year to year. The officers have therefore decided to accept for presentation each year only the best 300 papers selected on the basis of the quality of the proposals submitted.

Of the following, the best criticism of the officers’ plan is that the plan assumes that

(A) Professional associations cannot accept all papers submitted for presentation at their annual meetings.
(B) The total number of proposals submitted to the association will remain at approximately 1,000 in future years.
(C) Each proposal submitted to the association deserves to be considered a serious candidate for presentation.
(D) It is difficult to judge the quality of a paper on the basis of the proposal alone.
(E) The best 300 papers submitted to the association for presentation will be of the same quality from year to year.

Answer: D
Explanation
:

On the GMAT's critical reasoning portion, analytical and critical thinking abilities are assessed. To answer clearly, a person must possess strong cognitive abilities.

Conclusion: Choosing the top 300 papers (proposals) will guarantee consistent presentation quality requirements.
Basis: 1000 proposals annually
The 300 Best will always be of the same calibre, and proposals = papers = presentations, goes the supposition.

Let’s check the given choices,

A: Incorrect

It is an incorrect choice. The majority of the papers submitted for presentation at professional associations' annual meetings are not accepted.
Problem: Since we already know that the Association only intends to accept a portion of the total submissions, whether or not this is true is completely irrelevant.

B: Incorrect

It is the wrong choice. Future years will see a steady 1,000 or so ideas submitted to the association overall.
Problem: This is the trickiest response, and it's clearest why it's incorrect when we contrast it with the appropriate one. Basically, the overall quality of the top 300 submissions wouldn't change much whether there were 1000 submissions per year or not (whether there were 300 in total, or 3000). Even though it might feel like we would, we don't NEED to assume this.

C: Incorrect

It is an incorrect choice. Every suggestion that is sent to the association needs to be taken seriously as a presentation candidate.
PROBLEM: This is very similar to A. We already know that approximately 700 submissions will be rejected, so it is obvious that not every entry will be a strong contender for presentation.

D: Correct

It is the correct answer. Carlo was unable to fulfill his commitment to Miriam to pay back the money since he lost his job. Miriam didn't require this cash, though, and she didn't lose faith in Carlo's ability to keep his word either. Carlo's failure to honor his pledge to Miriam was therefore acceptable. Although breaking a promise was not his aim, he was compelled to do so by circumstances, so it is not wrong (the broken promise received its explanation)

E: Incorrect

It is an incorrect answer. The top 300 papers that are submitted to the association for presentation will always be of the same calibre.
SUMMARY: We must make this assumption. "The finest 300 papers submitted to the association for presentation will NOT be of the same quality from year to year," goes the NOT test to demonstrate it. Uh-oh. Now, even if we select the top 300 each year, we cannot guarantee a constant level of general excellence.

“The Asian American History Association receives approximately 1,000 pr” – is a GMAT Critical question. To answer the question, a candidate can either find a piece of evidence that would weaken the argument or have logical flaws in the argument. GMAT critical reasoning tests the logical and analytical skills of the candidates. This topic requires candidates to find the argument's strengths and weaknesses or the logical flaw in the argument. The GMAT CR section contains 10 -13 GMAT critical reasoning questions out of 36 GMAT verbal questions.

Suggested GMAT Critical Reasoning Samples

*The article might have information for the previous academic years, please refer the official website of the exam.

Ask your question