
Reading Passage Question
Adapted and reprinted with the permission of the author, Jonathan Rappe.
So what exactly do we mean when we say “environmental markets” and how are these markets going to impact the business landscape? First, the basics: Anytime a unit of exchange arises from an underlying activity that is perceived to benefit the environment by either the buyer of that unit or the governing body that created the units of exchange, the main ingredients of an environmental market are present. In a cap-and-trade system, the governing body places a cap on the total amount of air or water pollution that may be emitted by issuing an equivalent number of allowances, denominated in units of pollution. These allowances may be issued by the government to the business entities that are regulated by the program in amounts similar to their expected production, to lessen the economic impact, or those entities may have to purchase the allowances from the government in an auction. At the end of each specified period, usually a year, the business entities will have to surrender a number of allowances, or permits, equal to their generation of pollution during the period. As the governing entity reduces the supply of allowances available to the market in each subsequent year, the price will go up unless the regulated businesses invest in technologies that will reduce their pollution per unit of output, thereby reducing their demand and the overall market demand for allowances. Environmental markets that are not set up as cap-and-trade markets in the U.S. include the state-level markets for renewable energy credits, which are granted to producers of renewable energy and given value because utilities must purchase an amount of these credits determined by the state, and the voluntary market for greenhouse-gas emissions, in which credits arising from a unit of greenhouses gas emissions avoided are granted to owners of qualifying project activities by accredited third-party verifiers and sold to voluntary buyers, primarily to conform with the buyer’s goal of becoming “carbon neutral.” Companies can claim to be carbon neutral if they purchase an amount of these credits for avoided greenhouse-gas emissions equivalent to the total amount of emissions they produce. This is increasingly important from a public relations and corporate responsibility perspective in the United States, even in the absence of federal legislation governing greenhouse-gas emissions.
“So what exactly do we mean when we say “environmental markets”- is a GMAT reading comprehension passage with answers. Candidates need a strong knowledge of English GMAT reading comprehension.
This GMAT Reading Comprehension consists of 5 comprehension questions. The GMAT Reading Comprehension questions are designed for the purpose of testing candidates’ abilities in understanding, analyzing, and applying information or concepts. Candidates can actively prepare with the help of GMAT Reading Comprehension Practice Questions.
Solution and Explanation
Question 1
When the author uses the word allowances, he is referring to
Answer: A
Explanation: The total quantity of pollution that can be released into the air. Or water by granting an equivalent number of allowances, each one worth a certain amount of pollution. To decrease the economic impact, the government may grant these allowances to the companies governed by the programme. In quantities comparable to their anticipated production or those companies may be required to buy the allowances from the government in an auction.
Question 2
The author believes that it is important for a company to become carbon neutral because
Answer: C
Explanation: If companies buy enough of these credits for reduced greenhouse gas emissions to offset all of their emissions, they may declare themselves to be carbon neutral. Even in the lack of federal laws regulating greenhouse-gas emissions. This is becoming more and more significant from the standpoints of public relations and corporate responsibility in the United States.
Question 3
The author of this passage most likely would agree that
Answer: D
Explanation: The author’s position throughout the passage has been supportive of activities that will lessen the negative impact on the environment. He would not agree with choice A or choice C. No evidence in the passage supports choice B. Choice E is unrealistic.
Question 4
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the author’s argument?
Answer: A
Explanation: The author’s argument would be most weakened by choice A, which is counter to his position. Unless the regulated businesses invest in technologies that will reduce their pollution per unit of output. Thereby reducing their demand and the overall market demand for allowances. The price will increase as the governing entity reduces the supply of allowances available to the market in each succeeding year. Choice B is too vague to weaken his argument. Choices C, D, and E, while tangentially related, are not opposed to his position.
Question 5
The author’s attitude toward the companies that “claim to be carbon neutral” can best be described as
Answer: C
Explanation: The free market for greenhouse gas emissions. In which project owners who engage in certain project activities are given credits for each saved unit of greenhouse gas emissions. Offered to voluntary purchasers by recognised third-party verifiers, generally in order to meet the buyers' desire to become "carbon neutral." If businesses buy enough of these credits for reduced greenhouse gas emissions to offset all of their emissions. They may declare themselves to be carbon neutral. In the lack of federal laws regulating greenhouse gas emissions, this is becoming more and more significant.
Suggested GMAT Reading Comprehension Samples
*The article might have information for the previous academic years, please refer the official website of the exam.