Zollege is here for to help you!!
Need Counselling
GMAT logo

Riger Clayton has Failed So Miserably in No Other Game as had His Performance GMAT Sentence Correction

Overview es 2Overview en 2RegistrationExam PatternPreparation TipsPractice PaperResultCut offmock testNews

Question: Riger Clayton has failed so miserably in no other game as had his performance in New England’s first baseball game in 2003 when he conceded 10 home runs.

  1. Riger Clayton has failed so miserably in no other game as had his performance
  2. In no other game has Riger Clayton failed so miserably as did his performance
  3. In no other game has Riger Clayton failed so miserably as his performance
  4. Riger Clayton has failed so miserably in no other game as his performance
  5. In no other game has Riger Clayton failed so miserably as

Correct Answer: E
Explanation: “In no other game has Riger Clayton failed so miserably as in New England’s first baseball game in 2003 when he conceded 10 home runs” - Correct. This answer choice has logically satisfies the intended meaning of the sentence. The intent of the sentence is that the failure of Riger Clayton in other games is compared with respect to the failure in the baseball game in New England. There lies no parallelism error in this answer choice. The sentence stated in this option is structurally parallel. Hence, option E is the correct answer choice as it satisfies the rule of grammar. Let’s take a look at the other options.

Option A

“Riger Clayton has failed so miserably in no other game as had his performance in New England’s first baseball game in 2003 when he conceded…”- Incorrect. There is a parallelism issue in this answer choice. The statement in this answer choice is not structurally parallel. Moreover, it does not depict the intended meaning of the sentence. The intent of the sentence is that the failure of Riger Clayton in other games is compared with respect to the failure in the baseball game in New England. Hence, this statement distorts the meaning of the sentence and makes the sentence irrelevant. Therefore, option A is the incorrect answer choice since it does not satisfy the rules of grammar. Hence, option A gets eliminated.

Option B
“In no other game has Riger Clayton failed so miserably as did his performance in New England’s first baseball game in 2003 when he conceded…”- Incorrect. The answer choice does not state the correct comparison as the intended meaning of the sentence. Here, “Riger Clayton” is compared with “his performance”. The intended meaning of the sentence is that the failure of Riger Clayton in other games is compared with the failure in the baseball game in New England. Hence, this statement is not structurally parallel. There is a parallelism error in this answer choice. This statement distorts the meaning of the sentence and makes the sentence irrelevant and illogical. Therefore, option B is the incorrect answer choice since it does not satisfy the rules of grammar. Hence, option B gets eliminated.

Option C

“In no other game has Riger Clayton failed so miserably as his performance in New England’s first baseball game in 2003 when he conceded…”- Incorrect. This answer choice depicts a comparison between “Riger Clayton” and “his performance” which is incorrect. Therefore, there lies a parallelism error in the sentence. The sentence is not structurally parallel. The answer choice does not satisfy the intended meaning of the sentence. The intent of the sentence is that the failure of Riger Clayton in other games is compared with respect to the failure in the baseball game in New England. Hence, this statement distorts the meaning of the sentence and makes the sentence irrelevant and illogical. Therefore, option C is the incorrect answer choice since it does not satisfy the rules of grammar. Hence, option C gets eliminated.

Option D

“Riger Clayton has failed so miserably in no other game as his performance in New England’s first baseball game in 2003 when he conceded…”- Incorrect. There is a parallelism issue in this answer choice. The statement in this answer choice is not structurally parallel. Moreover, it does not depict the intended meaning of the sentence. The intent of the sentence is that the failure of Riger Clayton in other games is compared with respect to the failure in the baseball game in New England. Hence, this statement distorts the meaning of the sentence and makes the sentence irrelevant. Therefore, option D is the incorrect answer choice since it does not satisfy the rules of grammar. Hence, option D gets eliminated.

“Riger Clayton has failed so miserably in no other game as had his”- is a GMAT sentence correction question of the GMAT exam. These questions consist of grammatical errors in the underlined part of the sentence. The candidates need to analyse whether the sentence is structurally parallel or not to identify the correct answer. The candidates need to examine the answer choices if the meaning of the statement satisfies the intended meaning of the sentence. The candidates must verify the awkwardness and redundancy in the sentence to determine the correct answer by applying logical concepts or ideas. The candidates need to choose the correct statement given in the options. The GMAT sentence correction section demands better skills in grammar since the candidate has to identify common grammatical errors. GMAT sentence correction is a part of GMAT verbal.

Suggested GMAT Sentence Correction Samples


 

*The article might have information for the previous academic years, please refer the official website of the exam.

Ask your question

Subscribe To Our News Letter

Get Latest Notification Of Colleges, Exams and News

© 2024 Zollege Internet Private Limited