
Reading Passage Question
One of the cornerstones of economic reform in the formerly Communist states is privatization, which can be approached either gradually or rapidly. Under the gradual approach, a state bureau would decide if and when an enterprise is prepared for privatization and which form is most suitable for it. However, gradual privatization would only prolong the core problems of
inefficiency and misallocation of both labor and capital. Under one of two approaches to rapid privatization, shares of an enterprise would be distributed among the enterprise’s employees so that the employees would become the owners of the enterprise. This socialist-reform approach discriminates in favor of workers who happen to be employed by a modern and efficient enterprise as well as by placing workers’ property at great risk by requiring them to invest their property in the same enterprise in which they are employed rather than permitting them to diversify their investments.
A better approach involves distribution of shares in enterprises, free of charge, among all the people by means of vouchers—a kind of investment money. Some critics charge that voucher holders would not be interested in how their enterprises are managed, as may be true of small corporate shareholders in capitalist countries who pay little attention to their investments until the corporation’s profits fail to meet expectations, at which time these shareholders rush to sell their securities. While the resulting fall in stock prices can cause serious problems for a corporation, it is this very pressure that drives private firms toward efficiency and profitability. Other detractors predict that most people will sell their vouchers to foreign capitalists. These skeptics ignore the capacity of individuals to consider their own future—that is, to compare the future flow of income secured by a voucher to the benefits of immediate consumption. Even if an individual should decide to sell, the aim of voucher privatization is not to secure equality of property but rather equality of opportunity.
“One of the cornerstones of economic reform in the formerly Communist”- is a reading comprehension passage with answers for the GMAT. Candidates must have a strong understanding of English GMAT reading comprehension. This GMAT Reading Comprehension section contains 4 comprehension questions. The GMAT Reading Comprehension questions are intended to assess candidates' abilities to comprehend, analyze, and apply information or concepts. GMAT Reading Comprehension Practice Questions can help candidates actively prepare.
Solutions and Explanation
(A) Undue prolongation of inefficiency and misallocation
(B) Loss of ownership in domestic private enterprises to foreign concerns
(C) Financial devastation for employees of private enterprises
(D) Inequitable distribution of wealth among employees of various enterprises
(E) Instability in stock prices
Answer: A
Explanation: The question asks for an answer that was not mentioned. According to this, the first option is the correct answer. This is because it is mentioned as a result of gradual privatisation rather than rapid privatisation. The remaining
options are all incorrect choices because they can be inferred from the passage and have support.
(A) Effective allocation of labor
(B) Equitable distribution of property among citizens
(C) Financial security of citizens
(D) Equal opportunity for financial success among citizens
(E) Financial security of private enterprises
Answer: E
Explanation: The first option is invalid because it appears in the first sentences, which is critical for the author to secure labour. The second option is also invalid because the author expressly suggests an equitable distribution. The third and fourth options are also invalid for the same reason that the author proposes them. Finally, the last option is the correct answer. The author prioritises labour and financial security for citizens, so this is the least desirable option.
(A) foreign capitalists will not be willing to pay a fair price for the vouchers.
(B) the future flow of income is likely in many cases to exceed the present exchange value of a voucher.
(C) foreign investment in a nation’s enterprises may adversely affect currency exchange rates.
(D) although the skeptics are correct, their point is irrelevant in evaluating the merits of voucher privatization.
(E) foreign capitalists are less interested in the success of voucher privatization than in making a profit.
Answer: B
Explanation: The only correct answer is the second selection. This is due to the author's claim that vouchers won't be sold because they are worth more if held, which is exactly what the statement implies. The remaining choices are all incorrect because they contain misinformation or false details.
(A) Describing a paradox that supports the author’s position
(B) Asserting that one drawback of an approach is outweighed by countervailing considerations
(C) Rebutting an opposing position by suggesting an alternative explanation
(D) Discrediting an opposing argument by questioning its relevance
(E) Characterizing an argument against a course of action instead as an argument in its favor
Answer: C
Explanation: The first option is simply a paradox that supports the author's point of view. The second and fourth options do the same thing. The final option has characterisation repeating from the question, almost a copy paste, straightforward proposed definition. Finally, the third option is the correct answer. This is because it does not refute anything, only assumes and diminishes something, and thus is the least correct.
Suggested GMAT Reading Comprehension Samples
*The article might have information for the previous academic years, please refer the official website of the exam.