
Reading Passage Question
My objective is to analyze certain forms of knowledge, not in terms of repression or law, but in terms of power. But the word power is apt to lead to misunderstandings about the nature, form, and unity of power. By power, I do not mean a group of institutions and mechanisms that ensure the subservience of the citizenry. I do not mean, either, a mode of subjugation that, in contrast to violence, has the form of the rule. Finally, I do not have in mind a general system of domination exerted by one group over another, a system whose effects, through successive derivations, pervade the entire social body. The sovereignty of the state, the form of law, or the overall unity of a domination are only the terminal forms power takes.
It seems to me that power must be understood as the multiplicity of force relations that are immanent in the social sphere; as the process that, through ceaseless struggle and confrontation, transforms, strengthens, or reverses them; as the support that these force relations find in one another, or on the contrary, the disjunctions and contradictions that isolate them from one another; and lastly, as the strategies in which they take effect, whose general design or institutional crystallization is embodied in the state apparatus, in the formulation of the law, in the various social hegemonies.
Thus, the viewpoint that permits one to understand the exercise of power, even in its more “peripheral” effects, and that also makes it possible to use its mechanisms as a structural framework for analyzing the social order, must not be sought in a unique source of sovereignty from which secondary and descendent forms of power emanate but in the moving substrate of force relations that, by virtue of their inequality, constantly engender local and unstable states of power. If power seems omnipresent, it is not because it has the privilege of consolidating everything under its invincible unity, but because it is produced from one moment to the next, at every point, or rather in every relation from one point to another.
Power is everywhere, not because it embraces everything, but because it comes from everywhere. And if power at times seems to be permanent, repetitious, inert, and self-reproducing, it is simply because the overall effect that emerges from all these mobilities is a concatenation that rests on each of them and seeks in turn to arrest their movement. One needs to be nominalistc, no doubt: power is not an institution, and not a structure; neither is it a certain strength we are endowed with; it is the name that one attributes to a complex strategic situation in a particular society.
“My objective is to analyze certain forms of knowledge”- is a reading comprehension passage with answers for the GMAT. Candidates must have a strong understanding of English GMAT reading comprehension. This GMAT Reading Comprehension section contains 7 comprehension questions. The GMAT Reading Comprehension questions are intended to assess candidates' abilities to comprehend, analyse, and apply information or concepts. GMAT Reading Comprehension Practice Questions can help candidates actively prepare.
Solutions and Explanation
(A) counteract self-serving and confusing uses of the term
(B) establish a compromise among those who have defined the term in different ways
(C) increase comprehension of the term by providing concrete examples
(D) demonstrate how the meaning of the term has evolved
(E) avoid possible misinterpretations resulting from the more common uses of the term
Answer: (E)
Explanation: The final option is the right answer. This is because his statement "By power, I do not mean." makes it clear that he is clarifying his own definition of power avoiding any misrepresentation. The first option contains terms that were not specified. The information in the second and third options is distorted. The passage did not reveal the fourth option.
(A) Law is the protector of power.
(B) Law is the source of power.
(C) Law sets bounds to power.
(D) Law is a product of power.
(E) Law is a stabilizer of power.
Answer: (D)
Explanation: The first choice is incorrect because in this little mention of law, there is no protection, which rules out that option. The third choice is incorrect because the scant mention of law makes no reference to establishing boundaries. The last option cannot be inferred.Out of the remaining two options, when looked carefully the second option is inaccurate. As a result, the fourth option is the right answer.
(A) Restatement of central ideas
(B) Provision of concrete examples
(C) Analysis and classification
(D) Comparison and contrast
(E) Statement of cause and effect
Answer: (B)
Explanation: The correct answer is the second option. This is because there aren't any specific examples or supporting evidence, which makes it difficult to analyse this passage. The remaining options are all invalid answers as they are mentioned in the passage clearly and can easily be supported.
(A) Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely.
(B) The highest proof of virtue is to possess boundless power without abusing it.
(C) To love knowledge is to love power.
(D) It is from the people and their deeds that power springs.
(E) The health of the people as a state is the foundation on which all their power depends.
Answer: (D)
Explanation: The first option cannot be concluded because there is no evidence of corruption. Since this passage knows nothing about virtue, the second option is ruled out. Also because author analyses knowledge in terms of power, the third option is invalid. We cannot conclude that loving knowledge equates with loving power. The final option is also invalid because "the foundation of power" is not dependent on "people's health." As a result, the fourth option is the right answer.
(A) concerned and sympathetic
(B) scientific and detached
(C) suspicious and cautious
(D) reproachful and disturbed
(E) meditative and wistful
Answer: (B)
Explanation: The correct answer is the second option. This is because the author is scientific, he uses social structures to back up his analysis. He is also detached in that he expresses no strong feelings toward social structures. The remaining options can easily be eliminated in accordance with this explanation.
(A) differing natures and directions of the forces that create them
(B) rigid structural framework in which they operate
(C) unique source from which they emanate
(D) pervasive nature and complexity of the mechanisms by which they operate
(E) concatenation that seeks to arrest their movement
Answer: (A)
Explanation: Only the first option is the correct answer. If power appears to be permanent at times, it is because the overall effect of all these mobilities is a concatenation that seeks to halt their movement. This should simply imply that power states (or forces) are transient due to the unique nature of each mobility.
(A) essentially the same from one society to another even though its outward manifestation may seem different
(B) usually the result of misunderstandings that impede social progress
(C) an inevitable feature of the social order of any state
(D) wrongly blamed for disrupting the stability of society
(E) best moderated in states that possess a strong central government
Answer: (C)
Explanation: Although power is unavoidable, it can vary depending on the influence of various social forces. The line "Power is everywhere" tells us this, indicating that underlying forces, particularly social forces, are universal and therefore inevitable. With this inference, it can be concluded that the third option stands as the right answer.
Suggested GMAT Reading Comprehension Samples
*The article might have information for the previous academic years, please refer the official website of the exam.