Zollege is here for to help you!!
Need Counselling
GMAT logo

Melinda: Prof. Ryan Anthony, Assistant Professor of Clinical Psychology GMAT Critical Reasoning

Overview es 2Overview en 2RegistrationExam PatternPreparation TipsPractice PaperResultCut offmock testNews
Rituparna Nath's profile photo

Rituparna Nath

Content Writer at Study Abroad Exams | Updated On - Feb 13, 2023

Question: Melinda: Prof. Ryan Anthony, assistant professor of clinical psychology at UT-Austin, is one of the world's foremost researchers on determinants of behavior. Using various experiments, he has convincingly demonstrated that his theory about the determinants of rabbit behavior generates consistently accurate predictions about how rabbits will perform in a maze. Citing this evidence, Prof. Ryan Anthony has claimed that his theory is irrefutably correct.

Bill: Then Prof. Ryan Anthony is not a responsible psychologist. The evidence does not conclusively prove that his theory is correct. Responsible psychologists always accept the possibility that new evidence will show that their theories are incorrect.

Bill bases his conclusion about Prof. Ryan Anthony on which one of the following?

  1. the application of a general principle
  2. an attack on Prof. Ryan Anthony's character
  3. the discrediting of facts
  4. the rejection of a theoretical explanation
  5. the use of an ambiguous term

Correct Answer: A
Explanation:

GMAT Critical Reasoning questions assess a distinct set of qualities associated with logic. The students preparing for the GMAT will experience the argument analysis of Critical Reasoning for the first time to substantiate their reason.

The above-given miscellaneous question types focus on apprehending the reasoning line or apprehending the logical structure of the argument. The candidate needs to determine a well-structured argument to solve the intelligence and critical reasoning question type. The candidate must understand the passage to evaluate the conclusion logically.

The arguments encompass various types of subject areas and strategies. These strategies need to be comprehended by the GMAT test taker. The GMAT Verbal Critical Reasoning passage usually consists of 100 words or less. The Critical Reasoning question is followed by five choices of answers. This critical reasoning examines Bill’s bases about Ryan Anthony:

Option A: Correct

“the application of a general principle”

Option A states that responsible psychologists continually accept the prospect that the new evidence will show that their theories are incorrect. It is a general principle. Thereafter, Bill's conclusion about Ryan Anthony is that Ryan Anthony is not in any way responsible to the psychologist based on this general principle. Hence option A is the correct answer.

Option B: Incorrect

“an attack on Prof. Ryan Anthony's character”

Option B mentions no such evidence where Prof. Ryan Anthony has anyway claimed that his theory is unquestionably correct. The evidence does not prove that the theory is correct. Hence option B is incorrect.

Option C: Incorrect

“the discrediting of facts”

In the above given option there is no conclusion obtained. Here option C examine Bill’s bases about Ryan Anthony. There cannot be any conclusion drawn from this provided data. Hence option C is incorrect.

Option D: Out of Scope

“the rejection of a theoretical explanation”

Option D mentions about the rejection of the theory. But the target was to deduce a conclusion about Ryan Anthony. Hence this option D is out of scope.

Option E: Inappropriate

“the use of an ambiguous term”

Option E states about using ambiguous term. The given question has no such terms. Hence option E is inappropriate.

“Melinda: Prof. Ryan Anthony, assistant professor of clinical psychology at UT-Austin, is one of the world's foremost researchers on determinants of behavior.” - is a GMAT critical reasoning topic. This GMAT critical comes with five options and candidates need to choose the one which is correct. GMAT critical reasoning tests the logical and analytical skills of the candidates. To answer the question, a candidate can either find a piece of evidence that would weaken the argument or have logical flaws in the argument.

Suggested GMAT Critical Reasoning Samples

*The article might have information for the previous academic years, please refer the official website of the exam.

Ask your question

Subscribe To Our News Letter

Get Latest Notification Of Colleges, Exams and News

© 2024 Zollege Internet Private Limited