Zollege is here for to help you!!
Need Counselling
GMAT logo

Knowledge of an Ancient Language is Essential for Reading Original Ancient GMAT Critical Reasoning

Overview es 2Overview en 2RegistrationExam PatternPreparation TipsPractice PaperResultCut offmock testNews
Sayantani Barman's profile photo

Sayantani Barman

Experta en el extranjero | Updated On - Feb 20, 2023

Question: Knowledge of an ancient language is essential for reading original ancient documents. Most ancient historical documents, however, have been translated into modern languages, so scholars of ancient history can read them for their research without learning ancient languages. Therefore, aspirants to careers as ancient history scholars no longer need to take the time to learn ancient languages.

The argument is vulnerable to criticism on which one of the following grounds?

(A) It concludes that something is never necessary on the grounds that it is not always necessary.
(B) A statement of fact is treated as if it were merely a statement of opinion.
(C) The conclusion is no more than a restatement of the evidence provides as support of that conclusion.
(D) The judgment of experts is applied to a matter in which their expertise is irrelevant.
(E) Some of the evidence presented in support of the conclusion is inconsistent with other evidences provided.

Correct Answer: A
Explanation:

Your capacity for analysis and critical thought will be evaluated on the GMAT's critical reasoning section. One needs a lot of mental capacity to respond clearly.

Each alternative needs to be carefully considered before a decision is made. Only one of the available five options will be accurate. The candidate must consider a variety of factors in order to make the optimal decision.

Given that, Reading authentic old manuscripts requires proficiency in an ancient language. Nonetheless, the majority of old historical texts have been translated into modern languages, making it possible for ancient history researchers to read them without having to master ancient languages. Hence, learning ancient languages is no longer necessary for those who want to pursue professions as ancient history scholars.

Stimulus: It's necessary to read materials written in ancient languages that detail ancient history. The majority of ancient texts have been translated into contemporary languages. Thus, candidates for professions as experts in ancient history are no longer required.
The case makes no connections between While most documents have been translated, some still need to be.

The ability to read ancient texts requires knowledge of their language.
Hypothesis: Since most historical texts have been translated into current languages, ancient history researchers can read them without having to master ancient languages.
Conclusion: Learning ancient languages is not necessary for aspiring ancient history scholars.

assumes that learning ancient languages is just useful for reading documents, but perhaps there are other uses for learning them for ancient history scholars.
Let's approach the answer choices.

A: Correct

It is the correct choice.

B: Incorrect

It is the wrong choice. Inaccurate descriptively. Which assertion is treated as though it were merely an opinion? In the premises, declarations of fact are not considered as if they were opinions.

C: Incorrect

It is an incorrect answer. Here, circular thinking is not present. The premises make no mention of the conclusion, which is that future academics are no longer required to learn ancient languages.

D: Incorrect

It is an incorrect answer. not descriptive enough. Where exactly does expert judgment come into play? It is not mentioned. Hence, this choice is eliminated.

E: Incorrect

It is an incorrect choice. The premises are complementary, and there is no inconsistency between them.

“Knowledge of an ancient language is essential for reading original anc” – is a GMAT Critical question. To answer the question, a candidate can either find a piece of evidence that would weaken the argument or have logical flaws in the argument. GMAT critical reasoning tests the logical and analytical skills of the candidates. This topic requires candidates to find the argument's strengths and weaknesses or the logical flaw in the argument. The GMAT CR section contains 10 -13 GMAT critical reasoning questions out of 36 GMAT verbal questions.

Suggested GMAT Critical Reasoning Samples

*The article might have information for the previous academic years, please refer the official website of the exam.

Ask your question