
Reading Passage Question
Jacob Burckhardt’s view that Renaissance European women “stood on a footing of perfect equality” with Renaissance men has been repeatedly cited by feminist scholars as a prelude to their presentation of rich historical evidence of women’s inequality. In striking contrast to Burckhardt, Joan Kelly in her famous 1977 essay, “Did Women Have a Renaissance?” argued that the Renaissance was a period of economic and social decline for women relative both to Renaissance men and to medieval women. Recently, however, a significant trend among feminist scholars has entailed a rejection of both Kelly’s dark vision of the Renaissance and Burckhardt’s rosy one. Many recent works by these scholars stress the ways in which differences among Renaissance women—especially in terms of social status and religion—work to complicate the kinds of generalizations both Burckhardt and Kelly made on the basis of their observations about upper-class Italian women.
The trend is also evident, however, in works focusing on those middle- and upper-class European women whose ability to write gives them disproportionate representation in the historical record. Such women were, simply by virtue of their literacy, members of a tiny minority of the population, so it is risky to take their descriptions of their experiences as typical of “female experience” in any general sense. Tina Krontiris, for example, in her fascinating study of six Renaissance women writers, does tend at times to conflate “women” and “women writers,” assuming that women’s gender, irrespective of other social differences, including literacy, allows us to view women as a homogeneous social group and make that group an object of analysis. Nonetheless, Krontiris makes a significant contribution to the field and is representative of those authors who offer what might be called a cautiously optimistic assessment of Renaissance women’s achievements, although she also stresses the social obstacles Renaissance women faced when they sought to raise their “oppositional voices.” Krontiris is concerned to show women intentionally negotiating some power for themselves (at least in the realm of public discourse) against potentially constraining ideologies, but in her sober and thoughtful concluding remarks, she suggests that such verbal opposition to cultural stereotypes was highly circumscribed; women seldom attacked the basic assumptions in the ideologies that oppressed them.
“Jacob Burckhardt’s View that Renaissance European Women Stood on” - is a GMAT reading comprehension passage with answers. Candidates need a strong knowledge of English GMAT reading comprehension. This GMAT Reading Comprehension consists of 7 comprehension questions.
The GMAT Reading Comprehension questions are designed for the purpose of testing candidates’ abilities in understanding, analyzing, and applying information or concepts. The comprehension question usually involves a recent news item, a topic linked to the competitive exam, or something from another area of life. Candidates can actively prepare with the help of GMAT Reading Comprehension Practice Questions.
Solution and Explanation
Q1) The author of the passage discusses Krontiris mainly to provide an example of a writer who
Answer: D
Explanation: The first paragraph introduces a trend: "Recently, however, an important trend among feminist scholars … Renaissance and Burckhardt’s rosy one". The second paragraph takes it forward and gives an example of Tina Krontiris.
Q2) According to the given passage, Krontiris’s work differs from that of the scholars mentioned in the highlighted text in which of the following ways?
Answer: E
Explanation: Refer to these lines: "Tina Krontiris, for instance, in her fascinating study of six Renaissance … group an object of analysis."
Q3) According to the passage, feminist scholars refer to Burckhardt’s view of Renaissance women primarily for which of the following reasons?
Answer: C
Explanation: Refer to these lines: "Jacob Burckhardt’s view that Renaissance European women “stood on a footing of perfect equality” with Renaissance men. It has been repeatedly referred to by feminist scholars as a prelude to their presentation of rich historical evidence of women’s inequality.
Q4) It can be inferred that both Burckhardt and Kelly have been criticized by the scholars mentioned in the highlighted words or which of the following?
Answer: B
Explanation:
Q5) The writer of the passage suggests that Krontiris incorrectly assumes that
Answer: A
Explanation: In the referred the lines it states that Tina Krontiris, in her fascinating study of six Renaissance women writers. It does tend at times to conflate women and women writers. Women’s gender, irrespective of other social differences. It allows us to view women as a homogeneous social group and make that group an object of analysis. Hence option A is the correct answer.
Q6) The last sentence in the passage serves mainly to
Answer: C
Explanation: The last sentence in the passage serves mainly to A D and E can easily be skipped as they are not relevant to the last sentence. Between B and C, B states Krontiris does not undermine the argument. She takes a cautiously optimistic position. Option C states that the sentence before the last sentence says that Krontiris adopts a cautiously optimistic assessment of Renaissance women's achievements.
Q7) The author of the passage means that the women studied by Krontiris are unusual in which of the following ways?
Answer: D
Explanation: In the referred the lines it states that the trend is clear, in works focusing on those middle- and upper-class European women. Their capability to write gives them disproportionate representation in the historical record. Hence option D is the correct answer.
Suggested GMAT Reading Comprehension Samples
*The article might have information for the previous academic years, please refer the official website of the exam.