
Reading Passage Question
It is almost a year since Abiy Ahmed, the prime minister of Ethiopia, launched a “law enforcement” operation against the government of the northern region of Tigray, which he accused of rebellion. Since the beginning, the ensuing conflict has been marked by war crimes. Late last year in the city of Axum, for instance, Eritrean troops fighting alongside Ethiopian forces murdered hundreds of civilians, mostly men and boys. And the Tigrayans have been accused of raping and killing Eritrean refugees in UN camps, among other atrocities.
Horrifying as these crimes are, they are now being eclipsed by an even more heinous one: a deliberate attempt by the Ethiopian government to starve its own citizens. Since the fighting broke out, Tigray has suffered an increasingly restrictive blockade by government forces. Since July, it has received only a fraction of the food needed to keep its 6m inhabitants alive, hardly any fuel, and no medical supplies at all. More than 5m people do not have enough to eat. Some 400,000 of those are facing what aid agencies call “catastrophic” hunger—the last step on the path to mass starvation. Aid workers compare the crisis to Ethiopia’s famine of the 1980s when supposedly 400,000-700,000 people died.
Ethiopia’s government insists it is doing all it can to help the hungry in Tigray and, in particular, it is letting aid pass through its blockade. Data from the UN tells a different story.
“It is Almost a Year Since Abiy Ahmed, the Prime Minister of Euthopia” is a GMAT reading comprehension passage with answers. Candidates must have a solid grip in English GMAT reading comprehension.
There are comprehension questions in the above GMAT Reading Comprehension passages. GMAT Reading Comprehension Questions are delineated to evaluate candidates’ abilities to analyze and be conceptual for the answers. Candidates can brace up and take preparation by answering GMAT Reading Comprehension Practice Questions.
Solution and Explanation
Answer: B
Explanation: Option(B) will be suitable for this question because it actually portrays Ethiopian Government’s failure regarding the handling of the situation. It has been stated in the last line where Ethiopia's government asserts it is doing all it can do for the purpose of helping in Tigray. Also more appropriately, it is letting the aid pass through its restriction. Data from the UN tells a different story.
Answer: D
Explanation: Option(D) is actually correct. The forceful nature of Ethiopia’s government is doing all it can to support the hungry in Tigray. Significantly, it is letting the aid pass through its obstacles and the real situation in the Tigray region. The forceful nature of the government of Ethiopia is doing all it can to help the hunger in Tigray. It is letting the aid pass through its hindrances. both are contrast information, which leads to unclear and opposite situation. Therefore, this situation proves to be wrong regarding the government’s claim.
Answer: C
Explanation: Option(C) defines to be proper for the answer. It states that during the latter last year in the city of Axum, Eritrean troops battled along with Ethiopian forces. The troops killed hundreds of civilians, particularly men and boys. The Tigrayans have been blamed of raping and killing Eritrean refugees in camps of the UN, amidst the other cruelties.
Answer: B
Explanation: Analyzing the above question, option (B) can be said as the overall motto of the passage. The consequent battle has been marked by war crimes from the very beginning. Lately in the Axum city, the Eritrean troops fighting side by side Ethiopian forces murdered hundreds of civilians, basically men and boys. So, the war crimes are one of the main causes of the diminishing circumstances in that region.
Suggested GMAT Reading Comprehension Samples:
*The article might have information for the previous academic years, please refer the official website of the exam.