Zollege is here for to help you!!
Need Counselling
GMAT logo

If the Recording Now Playing on the Jazz Program is Really “Louis Armstrong GMAT Critical Reasoning

Overview es 2Overview en 2RegistrationExam PatternPreparation TipsPractice PaperResultCut offmock testNews
Sayantani Barman's profile photo

Sayantani Barman

Experta en el extranjero | Updated On - Dec 31, 2022

Question: If the recording now playing on the jazz program is really “Louis Armstrong recorded in concert in 1989,” as the announcer said, then Louis Armstrong was playing some of the best jazz of his career years after his death. Since the trumpeter was definitely Louis Armstrong, somehow the announcer must have gotten the date of the recording wrong.

The pattern of reasoning in the argument above is most similar to that in which one of the following arguments?

(A) The museum is reported as having acquired a painting “by Malvina Hoffman, an artist who died in 1966.” But Hoffman was a sculptor was sculptor, not a painter, so the report must be wrong about the acquisition being a painting.
(B) This painting titled La Toilette is Berthe Morisot’s La Toilette only if a painting can be in two museums at the same time. Since nothing can be in two places at once, this painting must somehow have been mistitled.
(C) Only if a twentieth-century Mexican artist painted in Japan during the seventeenth century can this work both be “by Frida Kahlo” as labelled and the seventeenth century Japanese landscape it appears to be. Since it is
what it appears to be, the label is wrong.
(D) Unless Kathe Kollwitz was both a sculptor and a printmaker, the volunteer museum guide is wrong in his attribution of this sculpture. Since what Kollwitz is known for is her prints, the guide must be wrong.
(E) If this painting is a portrait done in acrylic, it cannot be by Elisabeth Vigee-Lebrun, since acrylic paint was developed only after her death. Thus, since it is definitely a portrait, the paint must not be acrylic.

Answer: C
Explanation:

Let's dissect the argument. The right response must follow a similar line of thought.

The first statement paints a picture of an impossibility.
Louis Armstrong played jazz after his passing. "Louis Armstrong recorded in concert in 1989"Since this is obviously absurd, only two scenarios are viable: either the performance did not take place in 1989 or Louis Armstrong
did not perform.

The final clause refutes the truth of (2), so (1) must be true.
This line of thinking should lead to the correct response.

C: Correct
The first statement describes an impossibility.
"by Frida Kahlo" – A Mexican artist from the twentieth century who worked in Japan in the seventeenth century.
There are two possible answers:

  1. not by Frida Kahlo
  2. not a landscape of Japan

The subsequent clause refutes (2) and confirms (1). This is the right response.

A: Incorrect
Let's try to dissect this response option.
Malina Hoffman is a sculptor who created this artwork; it is obvious that the issue is not insurmountable. One or two sketches may have been painted by a sculptor.
Since the argument contends that it is impossible, two things must be true: 1.

  1. Unlike Hoffman
    The response choice does not refute (2) what the question stem claims (1). It only states (1).

B: Incorrect
The first statement describes an impossibility.
The painting needs to be in two places at once. There must be two possible answers: 1. The painting is not by Berthe Morisot (the painting is mistitled). The second one cannot be inferred. Additionally, the argument does not state one possibility while rejecting another.

D: Incorrect
"Kate Kollwitz … her prints." This does not represent an impossibility. She might have sculpted one or two items, after all.
Two options are available: 1. not by Kathe. 2. not a work of art.
The response choice does not affirm the first while denying the second. Incorrect.

E: Incorrect
The first statement describes an impossibility.Elisabeth Vigee painted in acrylic; she should have used acrylic before it was known about.
There must be two alternatives: 1. Not by Elizabeth; 2. Not in acrylic.
The statement that follows does not refute either of the two. This renders (2) inaccurate because it asserts that it is a portrait.

“If the recording now playing on the jazz program is really “Louis Armstrong” – is a GMAT Critical question. To answer the question, a candidate can either find a piece of evidence that would weaken the argument or have logical flaws in the argument. GMAT critical reasoning tests the logical and analytical skills of the candidates. This topic requires candidates to find the argument's strengths and weaknesses or the logical flaw in the argument. The GMAT CR section contains 10 -13 GMAT critical reasoning questions out of 36 GMAT verbal questions.

Suggested GMAT Critical Reasoning Questions

*The article might have information for the previous academic years, please refer the official website of the exam.

Ask your question