
Reading passage question
Question: The hypothesis that people ascribe more value to things merely because they own them is at the heart of a highly influential theory in behavioral economics, known as the endowment effect.Economists ascribing to the theory have tried to illustrate this effect with the help of several experiments that seem to show that people value the things they own more than they value identical products they do not own and that they prefer to hold on to those endowed items rather than trade or sell them.Endowment theory says that such observable events, whatever their other possible causes, are at least partially explained by the general phenomenon of loss aversion, which holds that people give possible losses more weight than potential gains of the same magnitude.Endowment theory is an application of this phenomenon, adding the hypothesis that ownership determines whether one experiences a change as a gain or as a loss.Endowment theory posits that ownership sets one’s reference point, the movement from which triggers either a perceived gain or loss, and that people perceive the transfer or sale of endowments as losses.
Although endowment theory continues to enjoy considerable influence, recent experimental data have cast doubt on the hypothesis that ownership sets the reference point and that loss aversion generates the reluctance to trade.The empirical support for endowment theory was never perfect.In recent years, experimentalists have published data suggesting that the results of earlier laboratory experiments were not caused by loss aversion but by other factors.By making a few changes to the experimental design—such as better training subjects in the auction mechanisms used in the experiments, changing the way subjects were given the items, and modifying the procedures for eliciting choices—to rule out alternative explanations, experimentalist were able to make “endowment effects” that had been observed in the laboratory disappear.Many other researchers have since replicated these results.The new data suggest that ownership alone is not enough to change people’s expressed preferences.These results have led experimental economists and cognitive psychologists to develop alternatives to endowment theory.
“The hypothesis that people ascribe more value to things merely because they own them is at the heart of a highly influential theory in behavioral economics.”- is a comprehension passage with answers. Candidates need a strong knowledge of English GMAT reading comprehension.
This GMAT Reading Comprehension consists of 4 comprehension questions. The GMAT Reading Comprehension questions are designed for the purpose of testing candidates’ abilities in understanding, analyzing, and applying information or concepts. Candidates can actively prepare with the help of GMAT Reading Comprehension Practice Questions.
Solution and Explanation
Question 1
The economists ascribing to the theory of endowment effect would consider which one of the following as an example of this effect?
Answer: A
Explanation: This option is correct. As per the passage, the person values the product she has very high and isn't willing to sell it. Some students might get tricked by the fact that wine is a gift and that the person wants to drink the wine. So, option A is correct.
Question 2
The author is primarily concerned with
Answer: D
Explanation: This option is correct. The author talks about the theory and the studies that were used as a basis to prove this theory. He also mentions that there were problems with the study, but he didn't review these problems himself. Overall, this option is the best fit. Option D is correct.
Question 3
Which of the following is most supported by the information given in the passage?
Answer: B
Explanation: This option is correct. According to the passage, there are a few changes to the experimental design. Better training subjects in the auction mechanisms used in the experiments. Changing the way subjects were given the items, and modifying the procedures for eliciting choices—to rule out alternative explanations. Experimentalist were able to make “endowment effects” that had been observed in the laboratory disappear. It clearly says that “procedures for eliciting choices” were one of the elements that were tweaked. This was leading to a completely different outcome. Option B is correct.
Question 4
According to the passage, which of the following is NOT true?
Answer: C
Explanation: This option is correct. Because this option basically talks about the data that go against the theory and says that it has holes in it or is flawed. But the author says that the data used to support the theory is flawed. This choice is the only choice that does not flow from the contents of the passage. Option C is correct.
Suggested GMAT Reading Comprehension Samples
*The article might have information for the previous academic years, please refer the official website of the exam.