
Reading Passage Question
Since the early 1970’s, historians have begun to devote serious attention to the working class in the United States. Yet while we now have studies of working-class communities and culture, we know remarkably little of worklessness. When historians have paid any attention at all to unemployment, they have focused on the Great Depression of the 1930’s. The narrowness of this perspective ignores the pervasive recessions and joblessness of the previous decades, as Alexander Keyssar shows in his recent book. Examining the period 1870-1920, Keyssar concentrates on Massachusetts, where the historical materials are particularly rich, and the findings applicable to other industrial areas.
The unemployment rates that Keyssar calculates appear to be relatively modest, at least by Great Depression standards: during the worst years, in the 1870’s and 1890’s, unemployment was around 15 percent. Yet Keyssar rightly understands that a better way to measure the impact of unemployment is to calculate unemployment frequencies—measuring the percentage of workers who experience any unemployment in the course of a year. Given this perspective, joblessness looms much larger.
Keyssar also scrutinizes unemployment patterns according to skill level, ethnicity, race, age, class, and gender. He finds that rates of joblessness differed primarily according to class: those in middle-class and white-collar occupations were far less likely to be unemployed. Yet the impact of unemployment on a specific class was not always the same. Even when dependent on the same trade, adjoining communities could have dramatically different unemployment rates. Keyssar uses these differential rates to help explain a phenomenon that has puzzled historians—the startlingly high rate of geographical mobility in the nineteenth-century United States. But mobility was not the dominant working-class strategy for coping with unemployment, nor was assistance from private charities or state agencies. Self-help and the help of kin got most workers through jobless spells.
While Keyssar might have spent more time developing the implications of his findings on joblessness for contemporary public policy, his study, in its thorough research and creative use of quantitative and qualitative evidence, is a model of historical analysis.
“Since the early 1970’s, historians have begun to devote serious attention to the working class in the United States.”- is a GMAT reading comprehension passage with answers. Candidates need a strong knowledge of English GMAT reading comprehension.
This GMAT Reading Comprehension consists of 8 comprehension questions. The GMAT Reading Comprehension questions are designed for the purpose of testing candidates’ abilities in understanding, analyzing, and applying information or concepts. Candidates can actively prepare with the help of GMAT Reading Comprehension Practice Questions.
Solution and Explanation
(A) recommending a new course of investigation
(B) summarizing and assessing a study
(C) making distinctions among categories
(D) criticizing the current state of a field
(E) comparing and contrasting two methods for calculating data
Answer: B
Explanation: Option A is not right as it is not recommending a new course of information. Option B is the suitable answer because the 1st paragraph deals with the general information. How historians started giving more attention to the working class of the USA. The 2nd paragraph deals with the modest unemployment rates calculator by Keyssar . The third paragraph deals with how Keyssar closely inspects the unemployment rate. The fourth paragraph indicates that Keyssar 's research is a model of historical analysis and this gives an indication of how it is assessed . So in a nutshell one can say it deals with summarizing and assessing a study. Option C is not right as no distinction has been made among categories. Option D and E is not right because nowhere in the passage the current state of field is criticized nor any comparisons or contrasts between two methods were made in order to collect data.
Answer: A
Explanation: Option A can be deduced from the first sentence. “Since the early 1970s which gives an indication that historians haven't given any importance to the study regarding the working class in the USA. These inferences make option A the right answer. Option B is wrong because the statement "the narrowness of this perspective ignores the pervasive recession and joblessness of the previous decades”. The above statement indicates that studies conducted in the previous decades were criticized for its narrowness and it doesn't say the study itself was narrow. Moreover, nothing was repeatedly criticized. Option C is wrong because there is no mention regarding the type of study that is whether it's qualitative or quantitative. Option D is wrong because the statement " we now have studies of working class communities and culture " this itself indicates that studies were conducted on both. So option D can be ruled out. Option E is wrong because the study doesn't deal with Great depression.
Answer: D
Explanation: Option D is the right option because the statement "Keysar concentrates more on Massachusetts where the historical material are particularly rich and the findings applicable to other industrial areas" indicate that important findings regarding unemployment in Massachusetts are very important source of information that throws light upon the nature of unemployment of other states that was completely ignored by historians who were just concentrating on Great depression of early 1930s.
Answer: B
Explanation: Option A is wrong as 15% can't be an average rate instead it is the peak rate as it is mentioned “during the worst years in the 1870s and 1890s unemployment was around 15%". This indicates that unemployment rates were high and can't be average. Option B is the right answer because joblessness was so huge and 15% can just be an underestimate.
Answer: A
Explanation: Option A is right because the option indicates that unemployment rates weren't high compared to the Great depression and this can be inferred from the statement " the unemployment rate calculated by Keyssar appears to be modest at least by Great depression standards " So option A is the right answer.
(A) I only
(B) II only
(C) I and II only
(D) I and III only
(E) I, II, and III
Answer: C
Explanation: The statement "he finds that rates of joblessness differed primarily according to class ; those middle class and white collar occupations were far less likely to be unemployed " indicates that class is a factor. The next statement “even when dependent on the same trade adjoining communities could have dramatically different unemployment rates “. Here community refers to where a person lived and worked is mentioned in option ii so both (i) and (ii) are right according to the given statements.
Answer: E
Explanation: The mention and inclusion of words thorough research, creative use, model of historical analysis all indicates that he is not disapproving nor is showing any concern. He is neither skeptical nor neutral in his stance. All he does is being admired by it so option E qualified admiration is the right answer.
Answer: D
Explanation: Option D is right as it aligns with the findings in the statement “even when dependent on the same trade adjoining communities could have dramatically different unemployment rates ". Option E is wrong because moving of workers happened all over the USA and it is not just limited to Massachusetts.
Suggested GMAT Reading Comprehension Samples
*The article might have information for the previous academic years, please refer the official website of the exam.