
Reading passage question
A myth in the ongoing debate about minimum wages is that raising minimum wages will necessarily increase a country's unemployment rate. While there are cases in which a marginal increase in wage rates might impact the operations of a company dramatically enough for the company to change its operations, in most companies, the cost increases of higher wages will tend to affect a company's bottom line without altering its staffing structure. For example, if a particular fast-food location operates at a particular time window with a staff of five people, then five must be the minimum staffing level for that business to achieve optimal results. In the case of a national fast-food chain, especially, these operational questions in general will already have been optimized. Even before rates are raised, managers of these locations have asked themselves whether they can afford to cut jobs and whether they are staffed at optimal levels (in this case, five people). A more specific calculation is needed. In this example, the precise question is how a marginal increase in staffing costs would compare to the decrease in business that would result in decreasing the staff level from five to four and serving food less quickly. The results of this analysis would not necessarily be consistent across industry, or even across markets and companies within an industry.
“A myth in the ongoing debate about minimum wages”- is a GMAT reading comprehension passage with answers. Candidates need a strong knowledge of English GMAT reading comprehension.
This GMAT Reading Comprehension consists of 4 comprehension questions. The GMAT Reading Comprehension questions are designed for the purpose of testing candidates’ abilities in understanding, analyzing, and applying information or concepts. Candidates can actively prepare with the help of GMAT Reading Comprehension Practice Questions.
Solution and Explanation
Answer: B
Explanation: This option is correct. According to the passage, the primary point about fast-food restaurants is that their staffing is optimized. There is a secondary point also. It says that "more specific calculations" can be made about how staffing adjustments would impact the bottom line. B is correct because it expresses the idea that the locations are optimized. Option B is correct.
Answer: C
Explanation: This option is correct. The passage states that "will tend to affect a company's bottom line without altering its staffing structure". It means that if the companies are forced to raise wages, they will allow their profits to decrease rather than reduce the employees. Option C is correct.
Answer: C
Explanation: This option is correct. According to the passage, the fast-food restaurant case gives an example that allows the author to talk about how companies generally have optimized staffing. It also says the way in which that staffing is optimized. This means that they won't necessarily reduce staffing levels if minimum wages are raised. So, Option C is correct.
Answer: E
Explanation: This option is correct. The passage basically debunks a myth. It talks about minimum wages and the question of whether raising minimum wages will necessarily increase a country's unemployment rate or not. So, Option E is correct.
Suggested GMAT Reading Comprehension Samples
*The article might have information for the previous academic years, please refer the official website of the exam.