Zollege is here for to help you!!
Need Counselling
GMAT logo

Director of Ace Manufacturing Company: Our Management Consultant GMAT Critical Reasoning

Overview es 2Overview en 2RegistrationExam PatternPreparation TipsPractice PaperResultCut offmock testNews

Question: Director of Ace Manufacturing Company: Our management consultant proposes that we reassign staff so that all employees are doing both what they like to do and what they do well. This, she says, will “increase productivity by fully exploiting our available resources.” But Ace Manufacturing has a long-standing commitment to not exploit its workers. Therefore, implementing her recommendations would cause us to violate our own policy.

The director’s argument for rejecting the management consultant’s proposal is most vulnerable to criticism on which one of the following grounds?

  1. failing to distinguish two distinct senses of a key term
  2. attempting to defend an action on the ground that it is frequently carried out
  3. defining a term by pointing to an atypical example of something to which the term applies
  4. drawing a conclusion that simply restates one of the premises of the argument
  5. calling something by a less offensive term than the term that is usually used to name that thing

Correct Answer: A
Explanation: The argument of the passage claims that Ace Manufacturing has taken a long-established commitment not to exploit its workers. Here the term “exploit” precisely implies taking advantage of the worker. That is, it means taking unfair benefits from the workers. However, the director intends to reassign staff in such a way that the staff can do whatever they want to do. This is because he wants to make the staff perform in a good manner and wants to keep them happy. Here, the term “exploiting resources” indicates making reasonable use of staff. It does not refer to taking unfair benefits from them rather it aims to offer them job satisfaction. Therefore, the passage is indeed a failure to establish a distinction between two different purposes of the keyword “exploit”. Hence, option A is the correct answer choice. Let’s take a look at the other options.

Option B
This answer states that the director violates the management consultant’s proposal in order to try to support an action that is often carried out. However, this fact is completely irrelevant since it does not support the argument of the passage. The argument of the passage claims that Ace Manufacturing has taken a long-established commitment not to exploit its workers. Here the term “exploit” precisely implies taking advantage of the worker. That is it means taking unfair benefits from the workers. However, the director intends to reassign staff in such a way that the staff can do whatever they want to do. This is because he wants to make the staff perform in a good manner and wants to keep them happy. Hence, option B is not related to the context of the passage. Therefore, option B is the incorrect answer and thereby gets eliminated.

Option C
This answer choice depicts that the director wants to define a term by suggesting a typical example to give reference to the term. This option is nowhere close to the argument of the passage. The passage claims that Ace Manufacturing has taken a long-established commitment not to exploit its workers. Here the term “exploit” implies taking advantage of the worker. It means taking unfair benefits of the workers. The director, however, intends to reassign staff in such a way that the staff can do as per their wishes. This is because he wants to make the staff perform in a good manner and wants to keep them happy. Hence, option C is not related to the context of the passage. Therefore, option C is the incorrect answer and thereby gets eliminated.

Option D
This answer choice states that the director rejects the management consultant’s proposal to conclude one of the assumptions of the argument. This option is completely irrelevant to the argument of the passage. The passage claims that Ace Manufacturing has taken a long-established commitment not to exploit its workers. Here the term “exploit” implies taking advantage of the worker i.e taking unfair benefit of the workers. The director, however, intends to reassign staff in such a way that the staff can perform as per their wishes. This is because he wants to make the performance of the staff better and wants to keep them happy. Hence, option D is not related to the context of the passage. Therefore, option D is the incorrect answer and thereby gets eliminated.

Option E
This answer choice is completely irrelevant to the argument of the passage. It suggests that the director rejects the management consultant’s proposal to call by a less harsh term than the term usually used to refer to that thing. The passage asserts that Ace Manufacturing has taken a long-established commitment not to exploit its workers. Here the term “exploit” implies taking advantage of the worker i.e taking unfair benefit of the workers. The director, however, intends to reassign staff in such a way that the staff can perform as per their wishes. This is because he wants to keep them happy and wants to enhance their performance level. Hence, option E is not the correct answer and thereby gets eliminated.

“Director of Ace Manufacturing Company: Our management consultant”- is a GMAT critical reasoning topic of the GMAT exam. This topic has been taken from the book GMAT Prep Plus 2021. This GMAT critical reasoning comes up with five options and candidates must choose the one which is correct. GMAT critical reasoning tests the logical and analytical aptitudes of the candidates.

Suggested GMAT Critical Reasoning Samples

*The article might have information for the previous academic years, please refer the official website of the exam.

Ask your question