
Reading Passage Question
(The following passage was written in 1977.)
Changes in the volume of unemployment are governed by three fundamental forces: the growth of the labor force, the increase in output per man-hour, and the growth of total demand for goods and services. Changes in the average hours of work enter in exactly parallel fashion but have been quantitatively less significant. As productivity rises, less labor is required per dollar of national product, or more goods and services can be produced with the same number of man-hours. If output does not grow, employment will certainly fall; if production increases more rapidly than productivity (less any decline in average hours worked), employment must rise. But the labor force grows, too. Unless gross national product (total final expenditure for goods and services corrected for price changes) rises more rapidly than the sum of productivity increase and labor force growth (again modified for any change in hours of work), the increase in employment will be inadequate to absorb the growth in the labor force. Inevitably the unemployment rate will increase. Only when total production expands faster than the rate of labor force growth plus the rate of productivity increase and minus the rate at which average annual hours fall does the unemployment rate fall. Increases in productivity were more important than growth of the labor force as sources of the wide gains in output experienced in the period from the end of World War II to the mid-sixties. These increases in potential production simply were not matched by increases in demand adequate to maintain steady full employment.
Except for the recession years of 1949, 1954, and 1958, the rate of economic growth exceeded the rate of productivity increase. However, in the late 1950s productivity and the labor force were increasing more rapidly than usual, while the growth of output was slower than usual. This accounted for the change in employment rates.
But if part of the national purpose is to reduce and contain unemployment, arithmetic is not enough. We must know which of the basic factors we can control and which we wish to control. Unemployment would have risen more slowly or fallen more rapidly if productivity had increased more slowly, or the labor force had increased more slowly, or the hours of work had fallen more steeply, or total output had grown more rapidly. These are not independent factors, however, and a change in any of them might have caused changes in the others.
A society can choose to reduce the growth of productivity, and it can probably find ways to frustrate its own creativity. However, while a reduction in the growth of productivity at the expense of potential output might result in higher employment in the short run, the long-run effect on the national interest would be disastrous.
We must also give consideration to the fact that hidden beneath national averages is continuous movement into, out of, between, and within labor markets. For example, 15 years ago, the average number of persons in the labor force was 73.4 million, with about 66.7 million employed and 3.9 million unemployed. Yet 14 million experienced some term of unemployment in that year. Some were new entrants to the labor force; others were laid off temporarily. The remainder were those who were permanently or indefinitely severed from their jobs. Thus, the average number unemployed during a year understates the actual volume of involuntary displacement that occurs.
High unemployment is not an inevitable result of the pace of technological change but the consequence of passive public policy. We can anticipate a moderate increase in the labor force accompanied by a slow and irregular decline in hours of work. It follows that the output of the economy—and the aggregate demand to buy it—must grow by more than 4 percent a year just to prevent the unemployment rate from rising, and by even more if the unemployment rate is to fall further. Yet our economy has seldom, if ever, grown at a rate greater than 3.5 percent for any extended length of time. We have no cause of complacency. Positive fiscal, monetary, and manpower policies will be needed in the future.
“Changes in the Volume of Unemployment are Governed by Three” - is a GMAT reading comprehension passage with answers. Candidates must have a solid grasp on English GMAT reading comprehension.
There are 10 comprehension questions in this GMAT Reading Comprehension section. GMAT Reading Comprehension questions are designed to evaluate candidates' abilities to comprehend, analyze, and apply information or concepts. Candidates can actively prepare by answering GMAT Reading Comprehension Practice Questions.
Solution and Explanation
Answer: C
Explanation: to capture the primOption A is too confinedary purpose of the passage
Option B shines light on only one part of the passage
Option C in the last para the author talks of how passive economic policies are the reason for unemployment
Option D is out of scope
Option E is not relevant to the passage
Thus, the correct answer is option C
Answer: E
Explanation: If total production exceeds total demand, some goods and services will go to waste; if there are insufficient sales, some employees will need to be let go; as a result, unemployment will rise. Hence, option A is not the correct answer.
If both "demand and productivity" increases, it is difficult to determine which one grew higher than the other. So it is inferred that option B is also the wrong answer.
Productivity and production both rise –but we don’t know which rises higher than others, thus option C is also not the correct answer.
Option D is ruled out because if productivity increases but not production, it may lead to increase in unemployment.
Over productivity, production rose. Thus, employment may increase. Hence, option E is the correct answer.
Answer: E
Explanation:
Hence, Option E is the correct answer as all the three occurred in the late 50s.
Answer: E
Explanation: “Except for the recession years of 1949, 1954, and 1958, the rate of economic growth exceeded the rate of productivity increase.” Option E is the correct answer as Productivity is greater than growth of labour, this shows that the rate of unemployment is increased.
Answer: D
Explanation: “while a reduction in the growth of productivity at the expense of potential output might result in higher employment in the short run, the long-run effect on the national interest would be disastrous.” This line shows clearly that option D is the correct answer as insidious means “proceeding in a gradual, subtle way, but with very harmful effects.”
Answer: C
Explanation: The passage states that about 15 years ago, the average number of persons in the labour force was 73.4 million. With about 66.7 million employed and 3.9 million unemployed. Yet 14 million experienced some term of unemployment in that year” these lines clearly indicate that option C is the correct answer.
Answer: B
Explanation: In this passage it does not mention about the change in productivity being invariable with gross product. Option B is the correct answer as it is not given in the passage.
Answer: D
Explanation: A claim is made, evidence is offered to support and amplify the claim, and a conclusion is reached.
Data is used to explain the extra information that is shown in the statement.
More information is provided for clarification, and a conclusion is provided for that information.
The option itself is self explanatory.
Answer: D
Explanation: “Yet our economy has seldom, if ever, grown at a rate greater than 3.5 percent for any extended length of time. We have no cause of complacency. Positive fiscal, monetary, and manpower policies will be needed in the future.”
Author concern that 3.5 percent growth is also not enough as there are some factors needed in the future. New policies are brought over by the government, hence Option D is the correct answer.
Answer: A
Explanation: This passage states steps to ensure that the unemployment rate. It does not continue to rise as our population and our use of technology increase. Option A is the correct answer as it summarizes the main idea of the passage correctly.
Suggested GMAT Reading Comprehension Samples
*The article might have information for the previous academic years, please refer the official website of the exam.