Zollege is here for to help you!!
Need Counselling
GMAT logo

Camus Broke with Sartre in a Bitter Dispute over the Nature of Stalinism GMAT Sentence Correction

Overview es 2Overview en 2RegistrationExam PatternPreparation TipsPractice PaperResultCut offmock testNews
Sayantani Barman's profile photo

Sayantani Barman

Experta en el extranjero | Updated On - Feb 15, 2023

Question: Camus broke with Sartre in a bitter dispute over the nature of Stalinism.

A) in a bitter dispute over
B) over bitterly disputing
C) after there was a bitter dispute over
D) after having bitterly disputed about
E) over a bitter dispute about

Correct Answer: A
Explanation:

To convince someone to modify their language, provide the following justification:

  • Parallelism
  • Thinking about two distinct truths
  • Modifiers

Given in the sentence that Camus and Sartre engaged in an argument. The topic of their disagreement was the nature of Stalinism. Two people do not "break." Perhaps it means they "broke up," like two individuals in a relationship do when they decide to end their relationship. Let's accept that. In either case, the disagreement did not conclude favorably.

The author is accurate that alternatives (C) and (D) are "unnecessarily wordy."
Unsupported assertions are not very helpful.
"Verbose" should be one of the last grounds for eliminating an option.

Camus and Sartre parted ways after a fierce argument over the essence of Stalinism.

— C is "Who was involved in this acrimonious conflict?

There was "a disagreement between whom?" Perhaps two of Camus and Sartre's friends were arguing, and Sartre took one friend's side, causing Camus to break with Sartre.

The distinction between (A) "IN" and (B/E) "OVER" is one of logical significance.

Set options A and E side by side A) Camus and Sartre parted ways in a fierce argument over the essence of Stalinism.
E) Camus and Sartre parted ways over a violent disagreement over the essence of Stalinism.

The nature of Stalinism was the subject of an acrimonious disagreement between Camus and Sartre.
Now, just A, B, and C remain.

(B) does not make much sense.
Camus and Sartre parted ways due to their profound disagreements regarding the essence of Stalinism.
— question which works better: disputing or a dispute (GMAT frequently likes noun forms to ING constructs) — in this example, "over" is in the incorrect position. Dispute OVER, not "over a dispute."
— is (B) as straightforward as (A) or (C)?
B vs. C may be difficult to predict, while B vs. A is not.
(A) is more lucid.

Then, A or C?
As stated previously, (C) does not specify WHO was involved in a bitter debate.

Answer A is best.

Let us check the given options.

A: Correct

It is the correct choice. This choice seems rational to me because it carries out the intended meaning; therefore, they sort of disintegrated during the argument.

B: Incorrect

This choice is an incorrect one. This option implies that they split up due to angry disputes, which is incorrect.

C: Incorrect

It is an incorrect choice. This choice alters the connotation as well because it sounds incorrect because they actually broke DURING the debate rather than AFTER it.

D: Incorrect

D is an incorrect choice. After having disputed... is a poorly constructed sentence. It would make more sense to say "after disputing" here. This usage of "had" is unnecessary and likely violates certain rules.

E: Incorrect

This is an incorrect choice. This option alters the intended meaning, and because both use the preposition "over," I believe it shares the same problem as B.

“Camus broke with Sartre in a bitter dispute over the nature of” is a GMAT sentence correction question. The text that is underlined in these questions has grammatical mistakes, and we must select the right response from the list of possibilities. The GMAT verbal section includes GMAT sentence correction.

Suggested GMAT Sentence Reasoning Samples

*The article might have information for the previous academic years, please refer the official website of the exam.

Ask your question