
Reading Passage Question
Because it impinges upon so much—from bilingual education, political correctness, and Afro-centred curricula, to affirmative action and feminism—the current discussion on multiculturalism is essential to understanding Western academic culture today. Charles Taylor‘s account of the development of multiculturalism out of classical liberalism traces it through changing conceptions of what he terms "the politics of recognition."
Deft as his historical account may be, any analysis of the motivations for multiculturalism solely in terms of ―recognition‖ must remain fundamentally incomplete. In his analysis are two central demands for recognition underlying classical liberal thought: the demand for the equal recognition of human dignity, and for recognition and respect of all human beings as independent, self-defining individuals. Multiculturalism, according to Taylor, rejects both of these ideals and their political application in an official ―difference-blind‖ law (which focuses on what is the same in us all). Instead, it embraces laws and public institutions that recognize and even foster particularity—that cater to the well-being of specific groups. These two modes of politics, then, both having come to be based on the notion of equal respect, come into conflict.
Taylor acknowledges that it can be viewed as a betrayal of the liberal ideal of equality when the multiculturalist calls for a recognition of difference rather than similarity, and seeks special treatment for certain groups—such as aboriginal hunting privileges or the "distinct society" of Quebec. However, he plausibly argues that to recognize only sameness is to fail to recognize much that is necessary for real ―recognition‖, since we are all cultured individuals with personal histories and community ties. Still, Taylor does not stray far from classical liberalism, insisting that multiculturalism be able to ―offer adequate safeguards for fundamental rights.‖
The more extreme forms of multiculturalism, which Taylor disavows, commit the crucial error of reducing all ethical and normative standards to mere instruments of power, because in doing so any distinctly moral arguments for these positions become absurd. Though Taylor seems correct to reject this diminution, he‘s wrong to think that the ―recognition‖ model alone can sufficiently account for the demands made by various minority groups for both the promotion of discrete cultural identities and the transformation of the dominant culture. For what many in these groups desire is much more than mere recognition or approval: it is the power to more effectively and independently control their own destinies.
It‘s even become common to disdain the respect or solidarity professed by those in the dominant group in an attempt to consolidate separate cultural identities. How Taylor misses this fact is not clear, since even his favourite example of Quebec's distinct society presents a case in which the primary function of the demand for recognition is to acquire the power necessary for those within to maintain, promote and even enforce their way of life. Taylor understands that the Quebeçois want more than to merely preserve their culture, or to have others appreciate it. They also want to create a dynamic, autonomous society in which future generations will participate as part of a common project. Unfortunately,he does not consider how this fact undercuts the notion of ―recognition‖ as an adequate lens through which to view their project.
‘Because it impinges upon so much—from bilingual education’ is a GMAT reading comprehension passage with answers. Candidates need a strong knowledge of English GMAT reading comprehension.
This GMAT Reading Comprehension consists of 7 comprehension questions.
The GMAT Reading Comprehension questions are designed for the purpose of testing candidates’ abilities in understanding, analyzing, and applying information or concepts. Candidates can actively prepare with the help of GMAT Reading Comprehension Practice Questions.
Solutions and Explanation
Answer: D
Explanation: Alternative A is distorted. Taylor is criticised by the author, but not his account of liberalism. B is not relevant. The complete opposite of what is mentioned is C. The correct response is D. Option E is inaccurate since the author never praises anything, thus praise is a poor verb choice.
Answer: D
Explanation: Examine the possible answers, paying particular attention to the sections on Quebec. Beginning with RN I The need for acceptance by one society is exemplified by the Quebecois. The author's argument at the conclusion of the section supports RN II. Taylor doesn't completely explore the consequences of his example of Quebec. Finally, the legislation provides support for RN III. The term "special treatment" is used to characterise the Quebecois' quest for their own society, hence the proper response is (D).
Answer: D
Explanation: To reiterate Taylor's fundamental point regarding liberal ideals: multiculturalism breaches them for legitimate reasons. The proper notion may be challenging to forecast precisely. Three responses can be readily ruled out, leaving only (D). The thought that perceiving just similarity is an imperfect conception is reflected in (D). It is reasonable to suppose that the author would concur with Taylor's position given that the author describes this as "plausible."
Answer: D
Explanation: Review the passages that were already covered: the author claims that Taylor admits multiculturalism breaches liberalism before credibly arguing that it is beneficial for it to do so. The summary is in (D). The other possibilities convey two concepts rather than just one, namely that multiculturalism betrays liberal ideals.
Suggested GMAT Reading Comprehension Questions
*The article might have information for the previous academic years, please refer the official website of the exam.