
Reading Passage Question
Almost 12 years after the landmark federal study “A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform” warned darkly of the “rising tide of mediocrity that threatens our very future,” we remain a nation at risk. We are a nation whose 13-year-olds have average math skills that rank below those in 14 other developed countries, according to one 1991 study. We are a nation whose college professors complain that before they can teach the classics, they must teach the basics. And while nearly all American adults can read and write at a basic level, according to a 1993 Educational Testing Service study fewer than half can use a bus schedule or accurately record car-maintenance information.
All this is despite the fact that education is the biggest line item in most state budgets. Indeed, the total US spending on education in 1994 was estimated at $484 billion, almost double the $250 billion spent on defense. But of the average $5,300 spent per pupil each year, some experts estimate that less than half goes into the classroom. The rest goes to such important auxiliary services as athletic coaching and lunch programs – but also to the bureaucracy that both supports and entangles the nation’s school system.
Today, the proposals for reforming education are nearly as diverse as the members of America’s 64.5 million strong student body – privatization, home-schooling and video instruction. While education remains largely a local matter, with only 7% of funding coming from the Federal Government, a debate is raging over the need to impose national standards, whereby every pupil at a given level must master the same body of knowledge and pass the same set of tests. The education act, signed by President Clinton last March, offers incentives to the states to develop uniform standards for students; it also promotes teacher training and parental involvement. But if there are to be national standards, then whose? And what about those schools that must first cope with gunfights in the hallways before teaching the import of the Emancipation Proclamation? Diane Ravitch, the author of the forthcoming book National Standards in American Education, points to the growing successes of such community-based programs as charter schools. “We have had a one-size-fits-all system, and it doesn’t work,” she says. “The move toward tailoring schools for different students is a good way to go.”
“Almost 12 Years After the Landmark Federal Study” is a GMAT reading comprehension passage with answers. Candidates must have a solid grip in English GMAT reading comprehension. There are 6 multiple choice questions in the above GMAT Reading Comprehension passages. GMAT Reading Comprehension Questions are delineated to evaluate candidates’ abilities to analyze and be conceptual for the answers. Candidates can brace up and take preparation by answering GMAT Reading Comprehension Practice Questions.
Solution and Explanation:
Answer: B
Explanation: The passage states that moreover all American adults can read and write at an intermediate level. At that time, on the basis of a 1993 Educational Testing Service study, less than half can use a bus schedule or precisely record car-maintenance information. The narrator points about the literacy of all Americans. So, option(B) is the correct answer here.
Answer: C
Explanation: The passage questions about the schools that must first manage with gunfights in the hallways prior teaching the bringing off of the Emancipation Proclamation. Diane Ravitch was the writer of the forthcoming book National Standards in American Education. He portrays the expanding successes of those community-based programmes, referred to as charter schools. It is inadvisable to set national standards on students all over. Thus, option(C) is the correct one.
Answer: A
Explanation: The American education has been portrayed by the narrator in the passage. Despite the huge allotments of funds for the purpose, the narrator mentioned the reason why education is in a dark environment. Lastly, the narrator proposed having schools based on students’ demands. He mentioned this point as a substitute of having national standards, which may be regarded as a possible solution to change it. Therefore, option(A) will be the appropriate answer.
Answer: D
Explanation: In the third paragraph, the narrator talks about Diane Ravitch, the author of the forthcoming book National Standards in American Education. She said that we have had a one-size-fits-all system, and it doesn’t fulfill the task. She also said that for the purpose of different students, the move toward tailoring schools is a positive way to proceed. Therefore, option(D) stands to be fruitful against this question.
Answer: A
Explanation: The federal study mentioned had been futile. It was futile even after many years. The risk mentioned in it has not been overcome even after 12 years after the landmark federal study. The core of the study is “A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform”. It sadly warned of the increasing tide of mediocrity by which our future would be menacing. Thus, we are leaving our nation at danger. Thus, option(A) stands to be justified here.
Answer: E
Explanation: Diane Ravitch, the writer of the near appearing book National Standards in American Education, points to the growing fame of a community. This community is about the programmes, referred to as charter schools. The community based programmes tailoring schools in reference to students’ benefits should be implemented. So, option(E) will be the fruitful answer.
Suggested GMAT Reading Comprehension Samples
*The article might have information for the previous academic years, please refer the official website of the exam.