The Analytical Writing component of the GRE assesses your ability to reason logically and coherently, as well as your ability to communicate and support your views. The Verbal and Quant portions are completely objective. The AWA becomes a valuable tool for demonstrating your critical thinking and analytical abilities. Furthermore, the GRE AWA is used to determine the authenticity of your writing abilities. It might be used as a yardstick to compare the quality of your SOP to determine whether it was written by you or someone else. The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals GRE Issue Essay is the topic model answers for which is provided below.
First and foremost, the requirements for the GRE AWA Issue essay is not the same as an argument essay. The idea here is to read through the prompt, then agree or disagree with the premise. Candidates should examine the following five-paragraph framework for the GRE Issue Essay:
The topic for the GRE Analyse and Issue essay is determined by the structure of the essay. The following structure needs to be followed by the candidates to properly organize the essay:

Introduction: Students have to introduce the topic directly. Candidates need to evaluate the topic and present its opinion in support or against the given statement. Further, candidates need to present proper instances that would be used to support the reasons and validate the candidate’s opinion.
Body Paragraph 1: One has to state his or her position about the topic clearly here. The first reason for the opinion needs to be stated and justified with an example. Using the strongest example candidates should make a clear understanding and carry forward the other parts of the essay.
Body Paragraph 2: Candidates need to give real life examples in this paragraph as well. Candidates need to ensure that their second reason is supported with examples which have real life value and are not vague.
Final Paragraph: Here a student has to write why he chose those examples and how it is relevant to support his own stand. The final paragraph should state the topic and provide the third reason for the opinion. Accordingly, the reasons for the final paragraph need to prove that the given issue for the essay topic is wrong.
Conclusion: In this last paragraph the student should make a contrast and show that his argument is right, and the given topic is wrong. After stating proper reasons he has to write clearly his stand again and conclude the essay.

However, in order to excel in writing the GRE issue essay, candidates need to follow the strategies given below that could be helpful for their practice.

• Unlike on the GRE, you must choose a side and stick to it throughout the essay. Candidates need to analyze a statement and give their opinion unlike GRE Analyse an Argument in which the author's claim must be questioned.
• Giving relevant, real life experience is very important. No assumption can be used here as examples. Candidates should provide their examples which are based on real-life examples that would help in validating the reasons.
• It is critical to make strong declarative statements that include active language and cause-and-effect statements. It will be a clear understanding of the example which would help in validating the opinion of the candidate better.
• Contrasting with the topic and proving that topic wrong is a good step to conclude the essay. Candidates should ensure that in their concluding paragraph, they restate the topic of the essay and the opinion of the candidates. This should be followed by briefly stating the reasons and concluding that the given statement is wrong.

Read More GRE Issue Samples

Topic- People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.

Models Answer

Humans engage in several risky behaviors despite being concerned about the negative implications of our conduct. Smoking, binge drinking, and driving without a seatbelt all have negative implications that few people are aware of. This awareness, however, does not keep us in check since we believe these are little dangers, and the temporary joys we gain from them greatly outweigh the risks. According to research, a biological rationale for such heinous behavior, and dopamine inside our brains causes us to engage in behaviors. By definition, a risky activity is one in which people may not accomplish what they expect as a result of taking particular actions. For various reasons, I believe that people should fully assess the repercussions of any rash action before adopting action.

Driving my car at 200 mph on the main road is dangerous for me since I am not used to it, whereas a private bus operator that drives his vehicle at that pace every day is used to it. I'm just thinking about a scenario in which I'm presuming a highway condition that's similar to city traffic, with clogged streets. As a result, the disaster risk on my predicted outcomes is determined by my intellectual ability. On highways, however, it is required to accelerate to a specific speed because all vehicles travel at that pace. On the highway, abruptly slowing down can lead to an accident. As a result, personal assumed consequences will not allow you to make the best option, but they may put people in a dangerous scenario.

Driving the car is not unsafe in the case above, rather instead renders it risky by presuming repercussions. Only by broadening my thoughts will I be able to overcome my fear, making a potentially dangerous situation commonplace. Exposing youngsters to sexual education, for example, is dangerous. As a result, I do not support sexual education, even at puberty, because it may lead them misguided. This might cause them to abandon their formal education, engage in physical pleasures, and so forth. Parents do not discuss any of this with their children; instead, they simply do what is good for them. As a result, improper knowledge leads to incorrect actions.

The same is true for practically any non-emergent surgical operation or therapeutic method. In which the practitioner and the patient must discuss the risks and advantages before making a decision. In case it is an emergency, however, the physician may not have enough time to properly analyze. So all of the repercussions or discuss this with the patient, and prompt action is required to preserve the patient's life. In such situations, informed permission is not required. Because our actions might have far-reaching implications, think carefully before making any big decisions. Another example is the housing bubble in the United States. People made dangerous decisions when it came to purchasing homes at inflated prices with mortgages they couldn't afford to repay. The economic recession was exacerbated by the housing market crisis, foreclosures, as well as the collapse of the mortgage.

Estimating is simply predicting what we think will happen; that's not always accurate. The risk could only be prevented if people have a lot of experience in that subject. When it comes to treating persistent conditions, such as lower back pain, patients have the option of having an operation or health therapy. In this situation, the physician should get informed permission before the surgery explaining the benefits of the surgery and the risks of consequences. Consequences such as irreversible nerve damage, hemorrhage, and anesthesia difficulties that may arise during the treatment. The patient would be expected to make informed choices with the assistance of the doctors, priorities, and a range of other criteria.